posted on Aug, 25 2009 @ 01:59 PM
Male circumcision is mutilation. I think people came into this discussion not making the proper statements for their opinions. The emotion was there
but they described things in the way they’ve heard it spoken. If you could speak the truth about the situation I think the subject would clarify
Male circumcision is not like female circumcision. Male circumcision is the same as pulling the clitoris out of the vagina and leaving it in the air
for the rest of the female’s life. The clitoris would protect itself and form what’s called Keratinization. You can look that word up if you like
it’s a medical term.
This is also what happens to the male’s penis after being exposed to the environment with no protection. This Keratinization forms tough skin around
the exposed glands. This skin makes it very difficult to feel anything and thus reducing pleasure. So if you’re a female and you’re reading this
thread consider yourself with a clitoris that has been coated with a thin strip of leather, how would that work during intercourse?
Probably not a good thing right? Also are the several thousand specialized nerve endings cut off during this procedure that you cannot get back. You
can restore to a point but you will not get back the nerve endings. You guys can look up restoring if you so desire to go down that road.
In a certain period in my life I did a massive study on this barbaric act to because I had checked every other avenue and found no answers for the
problem I suffered from. That road led me to circumcision. You can find a journal on the web written by a Dr who went under the knife later in life
and his before and after story.
Most men who grow into their adulthood do not go under the knife, which is half the reason I’m posting this. Most of you if male were circumcised at
birth. There’s no way for you to even make the decision now of whether it was a good thing or a bad thing. No offense intended but you really have
no idea if you haven’t strolled down both avenues.
A women couldn’t possibly understand the difference except in her experience with a man. The closest she can get is in thinking of her clitoris
undergoing Keratinization. No one has the right to make this decision for a child, you’re cutting off half of their sexual organ. That’s why you
see some men post with feeling when they respond to topics like these. They’ve been mutilated and are now living with the after affects.
There are support groups on the web for this very thing. I myself have hung around a few while restoring. If a man isn’t allowed to have his
foreskin then why do women get to keep the flaps(I do not remember the word for it) covering the vagina? It would be cleaner if those were removed
wouldn’t it? Women use feminine washes there and you know what? Men use a similar wash for their foreskin.
The fact is this whole thing started when hospitals started getting government kick backs for performing the operations. During the world wars there
was something called a "piss rinse". You see they didn’t have anything to give the soldiers to clean their foreskin with. This became a problem.
So here comes the solution, circumcision. I haven’t even scratched the surface on the amount of evidence stacked against this procedure.
Anyhow anyone who wants to research this can. Most of you it looks like take the easy way out and just say what you’ve heard all of your life. You
might want to google "circumstition". Those answers just aren’t true. I feel bad for the ones who don’t know any better because they went under
the knife at birth. It makes no sense to do it then it causes more harm than good.
It also fascinates me that men are frowned upon for complaining about being mutilated in this manner. It’s our body, if a women doesn’t like it
she doesn’t have to be with that man, plain and simple. The majority of the planet sees this as a barbaric act and does not perform it except for