Contrail/ Chemtrail Research Thread, page 9

reply to post by Essan

---

Nice one Essan, you even got some iridescence in there

Good indicator of a rapidly forming cirrus type cloud. My understanding is that iridescence occurs usually where cirrus or altocumulus clouds have water droplets or ice crystals, of the same size. Thats why you often see it at the leading edge of growing clouds

378.0 7787 -22.7 -38.7 22 0.36 319 72 330.7 332.1 330.8
377.0 7807 -22.9 -38.5 22 0.36 320 73 330.8 332.2 330.8
365.0 8043 -24.7 -36.7 32 0.45 319 75 331.4 333.1 331.4
327.0 8833 -31.3 -37.3 55 0.48 316 81 332.9 334.7 332.9
312.0 9165 -33.1 -42.1 40 0.31 315 83 334.9 336.1 334.9
307.0 9279 -33.7 -43.7 36 0.26 317 82 335.5 336.6 335.6
300.0 9440 -35.1 -44.1 39 0.26 320 81 335.8 336.8 335.8
289.0 9700 -37.3 -45.3 43 0.23 322 79 336.2 337.2 336.3
286.0 9772 -37.1 -48.1 31 0.17 322 78 337.5 338.3 337.6
270.0 10168 -40.3 -53.0 24 0.10 325 74 338.5 339.0 338.5
267.0 10244 -40.9 -53.9 23 0.09 324 74 338.7 339.1 338.7
250.0 10690 -43.7 -58.7 17 0.06 320 77 341.0 341.2 341.0
244.0 10850 -44.7 -60.0 16 0.05 315 73 341.8 342.0 341.8
232.0 11183 -46.9 -62.8 14 0.04 300 78 343.5 343.7 343.5
216.0 11655 -49.9 -66.8 12 0.02 305 85 345.9 346.0 345.9
214.0 11717 -50.3 -67.3 12 0.02 305 83 346.2 346.3 346.2
200.0 12160 -47.1 -75.1 3 0.01 305 65 358.0 358.1 358.0

The above is the upper air data from 12z at Larkhill

reply to post by visible_villain

---

Nothing to add there VV

I think Phage summed that up perfectly

300.0 9570 -34.3 -50.3 18 0.13 285 72 336.9 337.5 336.9
295.0 9687 -35.3 -49.3 23 0.15 287 74 337.1 337.7 337.1
283.0 9976 -37.3 -53.3 17 0.10 293 78 338.3 338.7 338.3
279.6 10058 -38.0 -53.7 18 0.09 295 79 338.4 338.8 338.4
250.0 10820 -44.5 -57.5 22 0.06 285 77 339.8 340.1 339.8
233.0 11286 -49.1 -62.1 20 0.04 287 81 339.7 339.9 339.7
208.0 12020 -55.3 -66.3 24 0.02 289 87 341.2 341.3 341.2
202.5 12192 -55.1 -67.0 21 0.02 290 89 344.1 344.2 344.1
202.0 12207 -55.1 -67.1 21 0.02 290 89 344.4 344.5 344.4
200.0 12270 -55.7 -66.7 24 0.02 290 89 344.4 344.5 344.4
198.0 12334 -56.0 -67.0 24 0.02 290 89 345.0 345.1 345.0

The above is sample from Michigan upper air data

OZ, what type of clouds are these?


thank you fir that vid maui


[edit on 26-8-2009 by banned4life]

reply to post by Essan

---

Nice pictures of chemtrails!

reply to post by banned4life

---

The link doesnt seem to be working on my computer..

Can you try to embed it?

reply to post by OzWeatherman

---

sure, didn't i embed it here's a link
www.youtube.com...

does that help. i know there's alot of different clouds in here. if you don't mind pointing out to me what a few different types of clouds we are seeing here in that vid.

maui says the skies over there look different so i'd like to know what clouds are uncommon for the islands. thanks.

[edit on 26-8-2009 by banned4life]

Originally posted by Udontknowme
reply to post by Essan

---

Nice pictures of chemtrails!

Thats pictures of cirrus and also some iridescence. You should do some research

Here's a link

www.atoptics.co.uk...

By the way, the upper air data from the weather balloon supports Essans observation

reply to post by banned4life

---

If you had embedded it correctly, the video would have the traingular "play" button in it.

I still cant get the link to work. I tried youtube and it seems to be working fine...Im not sure whats wrong

Thats mainly cirrocumulus and there is also cirrus in there as well, and there was also altocumulus

This website here is quite good as it shows a wide range of all types of clouds, and weather phenomena.

australiasevereweather.com...

[edit on 26/8/2009 by OzWeatherman]

reply to post by banned4life

---

It works for me.
It's a collection of cirrus clouds and cumulus clouds. With a nice addition of a mackerel sky (altocumulus). I see nothing unusual in any of it.


Here's a really nice example



[edit on 8/26/2009 by Phage]

reply to post by OzWeatherman

---

I really think that the conditions are just suitable for them here.
I have seen them often enough.

I'll take my camcorder with me tomorrow (makes mental note). Perhaps I can catch another one before the front moves in completely. I'm not sure at what time the weather is supposed to turn sour, but I think it may be spotty.

Like today perhaps, but with more moisture yet.

I'll try my best.

reply to post by JayinAR

---

It would be cool if you could grab a look here and see if you can take a stab at ID'ing the planes you're spotting. The first number on the second line of each ID is the altitude in 100's.
Northwest Arkansas Regional

(You get weather radar as a bonus!)

[edit on 8/26/2009 by Phage]

reply to post by Phage

---

Alright, I'll give it a shot tomorrow.
Or, in the case of rain, whenever I can spot them again. Shouldn't be long, though.
However, I have a question.
How do you use that site to track these planes visually?
I mean, I plan to gain some video, if possible. But with a quick look-through of the site, I couldn't find any way to track the planes at all.

By my eye I can tell if they are landing at XNA, as it is very close. They are either approaching, or they aren't.
If they aren't, they are flying over and they are therefore too high to get a good visual on the jet.
I said that today I could see the jet, and I could. But only enough of it to see that it was a big jet. Other than that, I couldn't tell much.

reply to post by JayinAR

---

That's why I said "take a stab" at it. There would be some guesswork and luck involved. When you see a contrail being formed overhead, check the website (if you can) to see if there is a plane showing over your location. You should be able to make some correlation.

reply to post by Phage

---

Oh, okay.
When I went to the site I was thinking you were requesting me identify the planes I saw today.

If I record some of the contrails then I can simply go back and look at the flight data.
It will actually be somewhat easy, considering XNA is so close to me. I should be able to note if it is an over-flight or something coming in.

I'll give it a crack tomorrow.

PS - Normally, I don't have access to the net during the day. Which is why I need to film them.
That way I can get a rough idea of heading and whatnot. Possibly even a guesstimate of altitude to compare to the site's data.

[edit on 27-8-2009 by JayinAR]

Proof of chemtrail/geo-engineering May 11
  Posted 13 days ago with 45 member flags

How To Kill Chemtrails
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags

Have you sampled yourself and found chemtrail "poisons"??
  Posted 19 days ago with 6 member flags

Contrail / Chemtrail Testing...
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags

A lots of chemtrails in denmark!!!
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags

Is this the REAL reason for chemtrails?
  Posted 1 days ago with 4 member flags

The Effects of Commercially-Sold Tobacco Products & Additives Changing Mind Schemes
  Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags

Chemtrail over UTAH before Ring of Fire
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: