reply to post by Udontknowme
So your data, could be two miles from where the contrails are being formed, and in that short distance, conditions could have changed from
where your soundings are being done, and the contrails are being observed, according to you.
Because of time zone differences, the OP is off ATS atm. SO, I'll jump and say
RIGHT! You're finally getting it. Good for you!
The weather ballon info is important, to show people who refuse to understand, that what they EXPERIENCE on the ground, IE, temperature and humidity
on the surface, has no bearing on conditions at altitude. THUS, the common misconception that what they're observing
must therefore be
"chemtrails". Glad to see you are getting it now.
AND, of course, the ballon readings indicate a general trend, at the various altitudes. It is impractical to expect EXACT meter-by-meter mapping of
ALL the details!!! Hence, pockets of drier air WILL be embedded within higher humidity areas.
Also, I noticed you are posting pressures of up around 500-1000. Most ac fly around 300 hpa.
I'm sure if you wait, there will be more data forthcoming. 500 hPa is approximately 5,600 meters. About 18,000 feet. Of course you know, 1000 hPa
is close to Sea Level...standard is 1016. The data is showing, for starters, how atmospheric conditions change with altitude. It seems to be a
tragic lack of knowledge on most people's parts, in this area.
Sorry, you've been debunked again.
!!!! I thought you were understanding??!! Firstly,
OzW has
NEVER been "bebunked"!! SO, there's no 'again'!
And, second...the data does not lie. "chemtrail" websites, one in particular comes to mind, but I won't mention it, for I don't want any of them
to get 'hits'....those websites ALL lie.
_________________________________________________________
edit: because after posting, I went to look again.
Udontknowme, YOU are 'debunking' yourself, by LYING about the data
OzWeatherman posted!!
Here's a snippet, from his post, just a few above where you posted:
..........
300.0 9370 -40.1 -41.7 85 0.33 215 72 328.7 330.0 328.8
298.0 9415 -40.5 -42.1 84 0.32 215 72 328.8 330.1 328.9
290.0 9600 -42.1 -43.8 83 0.27 211 72 329.1 330.2 329.1
279.0 9861 -43.6 -49.6 51 0.15 205 71 330.6 331.2 330.6
274.0 9982 -44.3 -52.3 41 0.11 207 71 331.3 331.8 331.3
254.0 10486 -48.3 -56.3 39 0.07 215 72 332.6 332.9 332.6
250.0 10590 -49.5 -56.5 44 0.07 215 72 332.3 332.7 332.4
240.0 10856 -52.1 -58.1 48 0.06 218 73 332.3 332.6 332.4
231.0 11100 -54.2 -59.2 54 0.06 220 73 332.8 333.1 332.8
218.0 11469 -57.3 -60.9 64 0.05 215 69 333.5 333.7 333.5
215.0 11558 -58.1 -61.3 67 0.05 213 69 333.6 333.8 333.6
204.0 11886 -60.7 -64.6 60 0.03 205 70 334.6 334.8 334.6
203.0 11917 -60.9 -64.9 59 0.03 205 71 334.7 334.9 334.7
200.0 12010 -58.7 -63.4 54 0.04 210 75 339.6 339.8 339.7
I see a range from 300 up to 200 hPa there!!!
WHY would you claim he was only showing data to 500 millibars???
Shame.
For those who don't know....300 hPa is about 30,065 feet (9,166 metres)-- well nigh where airplanes cruise. 200 hPa is even higher -- about 38,662
feet (11,787 metres). Those are from the "standard" table of equivalents.
[edit on 24 August 2009 by weedwhacker]
