Originally posted by Shadow18433
BUT hey... all the well known Freemasons at ATS should go and
take a picture of themself...near their faces and standing in front of all their personal city welcome signs.

Would you settle for a picture infront on my State's welcome sign?



Thanks to Brother Norton who held the camera.

its so simple, conflict of interest.

Conflict of interest, is what allows Freemasonry to be a possible conspiracy. It's that simple. So long as its a secret, and so long as there are two or more parties, and so long as Freemasons are police officers, doctors, politicians, and presidents there will be a conflict of interest;

masons have a bound duty to protect each other above all else.

Hence, conflict of interest ,and, Because its secret also, this can fit the general term for conspiracy, most especially in these positions of influence such as law enforcement, as then, the bound duty (i.e. agreement between masons to protect eachother) , by the definition of the agreement, could stand in the way of unbiased separatism in fulfilling other bound duties.

This is a really legitimate reason for concern. It seems, when talking to Masons , I have found a high level of scrutiny applied to me, so this one is more stringently careful to be airtight. No accusations, no assertion, a simple basis for conflict of interest & formative of the definition of conspiracy;

1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.


I'm not saying Freemasons are breaking the law, I'm not saying Freemasons _are_ performing illegal acts, I am saying when freemason(s) are in a position of power, and in a binding agreement with fellow masons a conflict of interest arises at the very least, the clear possibility of active conspiracy exists, not saying there is conspiracy. Saying its clearly ignorant to assume two binding agreements between two seperate organisations, one of which is secret isn't either a. a conflict of interest or b. a possible conspiracy

god help me when i start getting replies from masons after making this post.






A

[edit on 2-9-2009 by 7redorbs]

[edit on 2-9-2009 by 7redorbs]

Originally posted by 7redorbs
masons have a bound duty to protect each other above all else.

There's the fundamental flaw in your whole argument. Masons have no such duty. In the obligations I took, just about every clause had a way out... things like "should I deem his need worthy" or "if there's a greater chance of success than risk to yourself". There's nothing in the oaths that would make a good man do bad deeds simply because he felt obliged to his brothers.

Originally posted by JoshNorton

Originally posted by 7redorbs
masons have a bound duty to protect each other above all else.

There's the fundamental flaw in your whole argument. Masons have no such duty. In the obligations I took, just about every clause had a way out... things like "should I deem his need worthy" or "if there's a greater chance of success than risk to yourself". There's nothing in the oaths that would make a good man do bad deeds simply because he felt obliged to his brothers.

thanks for the input, i see what you mean.



A

Originally posted by network dude
...and drink some sweet tea. NO beer for us.

That really needs no further comment.

Sorry.

Originally posted by Shadow18433
The secret is, Augustusmasonicus is the worshipful master of a group of imaginary friends... login Appak, login Joshnorton... as for Patricia..., it's his feminine side...Sorry, couldn't resist it either..

Once again, easy to prove, no one uses my home computer execpt me. Same for my work laptop. When Josh's ISP comes up as Texas and mine comes up as New Jersey you may have a bit of a problem. I would really want someone to check this. Unlike you I only post under this name. Thank you Achill...I mean Road Warr...I mean NWO Secret Agend....wow, so many bannings I can hardly keep track.