reply to post by bsbray11
Unfortunately you have misinterpreted what I was saying. I was talking about alignments.
May I butt in, and ask
bsbray what exactly you mean by the term "alignments"??
Am I am jumping to the wrong conclusion, based on the term, please correct me.
ALL I know is, from a purely astronomical standpoint, there is no actual "alignment" with the physical "Center of the Galaxy", because the Galaxy
is so large, it is a moot point.
I will attempt to address this concept, by comparing the artificial "grid" that we Humans use as a co-ordinate system to deterine positions on the
Earth's surface. It is the Lat/Long concept, and as I said, is arbitrary. IT requires a mutually-agreed-upon site as a starting point --- which is
the imaginary line of Meridian (longitude) that passes through Greenwich, England.
This imaginary line has to be anchored at two points, and those are the calculated axis points, that are defined by the planet Earth's rotation, so
they are the "true" lines relevant to the "true' axis, of the Earth. THEN, of course, to make a grid, the lines of "latitude" have to be
defined...(they are also sometimes refered to as "parallels", for obvious reasons).
Since we anchored the lines of longitude at the two "true" poles, the logical place to bisect those lines is at the Equator. This is the ONLY PLACE
where the angle, between the lines of longitude, and line of latitude, is closest to being 90 degrees!!!
ALL OF THE REST falls into place, when you condider MORE arbitrary things, such as the use of 360 as a number to measure the fullness of degrees in a
circle....we seem to have that number, a factor of 12, instead of a more logical factor of ten, for reasons that date to antiquity....whether
Sumerians, or Maya....who knows???
The "12" follows us, into our time-keeping standards too. WHY???
Humans have a base-ten obviousness, just by counting fingers and thumbs...BUT, the MOON shows an approximate 'twelve' cycle...see the dilemma?
NOW.....when the idea of "past prohecies" crops up, it is usually presented in a vacuum, in the sense that the entirety of Human Culture, and the
complexities of how we have arrived at our current paradigm, are ignored.
I don't wish to ignore, either, in what I post....the possiblity of
spiritual aspects in the mix....I just wish to keep that open, for
discussion, and hope that everyone sees a few other aspects to what some of their pre-conceived ideas may blind them to.