Penn & Teller - 2012 [video], page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 22-8-2009 @ 05:21 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by bsbray11



Unfortunately you have misinterpreted what I was saying. I was talking about alignments.


May I butt in, and ask bsbray what exactly you mean by the term "alignments"??

Am I am jumping to the wrong conclusion, based on the term, please correct me.

ALL I know is, from a purely astronomical standpoint, there is no actual "alignment" with the physical "Center of the Galaxy", because the Galaxy is so large, it is a moot point.

I will attempt to address this concept, by comparing the artificial "grid" that we Humans use as a co-ordinate system to deterine positions on the Earth's surface. It is the Lat/Long concept, and as I said, is arbitrary. IT requires a mutually-agreed-upon site as a starting point --- which is the imaginary line of Meridian (longitude) that passes through Greenwich, England.

This imaginary line has to be anchored at two points, and those are the calculated axis points, that are defined by the planet Earth's rotation, so they are the "true" lines relevant to the "true' axis, of the Earth. THEN, of course, to make a grid, the lines of "latitude" have to be defined...(they are also sometimes refered to as "parallels", for obvious reasons).

Since we anchored the lines of longitude at the two "true" poles, the logical place to bisect those lines is at the Equator. This is the ONLY PLACE where the angle, between the lines of longitude, and line of latitude, is closest to being 90 degrees!!!

ALL OF THE REST falls into place, when you condider MORE arbitrary things, such as the use of 360 as a number to measure the fullness of degrees in a circle....we seem to have that number, a factor of 12, instead of a more logical factor of ten, for reasons that date to antiquity....whether Sumerians, or Maya....who knows???

The "12" follows us, into our time-keeping standards too. WHY???

Humans have a base-ten obviousness, just by counting fingers and thumbs...BUT, the MOON shows an approximate 'twelve' cycle...see the dilemma?

NOW.....when the idea of "past prohecies" crops up, it is usually presented in a vacuum, in the sense that the entirety of Human Culture, and the complexities of how we have arrived at our current paradigm, are ignored.

I don't wish to ignore, either, in what I post....the possiblity of spiritual aspects in the mix....I just wish to keep that open, for discussion, and hope that everyone sees a few other aspects to what some of their pre-conceived ideas may blind them to.


reply posted on 22-8-2009 @ 05:21 PM by bsbray11
Originally posted by Diplomat
Well then fine, go ahead and add your little technical "ascension theory" on top of all the other ridiculous 2012 theories and we'll wait and see which one is correct! lol... maybe they're ALL correct.


Hmm. There's something smacking of a logical fallacy in ridiculing something before you even know what it is.


Stanford Professor Emeritus of Materials Science and Engineering, Dr. William A. Tiller:
Stanford bio link

Look into the scientific papers and books he has written. I was interested enough to spend $10 on his book "Science and Human Transformation: Subtle Energies, Intentionality and Consciousness" used from a library (though you certainly don't have to yourself!) and I was totally satisfied, as an engineering student, with the information he laid out. Well, satisfied with what he was able to lay out, but teased, because Dr. Tiller would probably be the first to tell you that his work is only laying the foundation for a new field of investigation, and he did this with controlled experiments demonstrating the existence of an energy currently unknown to us that precedes electromagnetic energy in the human body, and it can actually extend outside of the human body, therefore outside of the CNS. He isn't the only scientist involved with this work, if you investigate it further, only a prominent one tenuring at a prominent educational institution. And Dr. Tiller's papers alone go back to at least 1993.

This is one facet of many, that all inter-relate when you know enough about them individually to see how their postulates overlap, that various philosophies talk about different aspects and dimensions of the exact same things. But if you want to be snide and arrogant about it, there is hard science for you to get started with.

[edit on 22-8-2009 by bsbray11]



reply posted on 22-8-2009 @ 05:25 PM by dragonridr
reply to post by zerbot565



It doesnt work like a leap year but my no means does the mayan calender end on 2012.

Maya stelae occasionally show dates beyond 2012. Most of these are in the form of "distance dates", where a Long Count date is given with a distance date to be added. For example, on the Tablet of Inscriptions from Palenque the following Long Count date was found: 9.8.9.13.0 8 Ahau 13 Pop (24 March 603 Gregorian) with a distance date of 10.11.10.5.8. The resulting date is given as 1.0.0.0.0.8 5 Lamat 1 Mol, or 21 October 4772 – almost 3,000 years into the future. The king Pacal of Palenque predicted that on this date the eightieth Calendar Round anniversary of his accession will be celebrated, suggesting he did not believe the world would end in 2012.


reply posted on 22-8-2009 @ 05:30 PM by zerbot565
reply to post by dragonridr



as i understood its rings within rings within rings, and by changing the aligment of one ring you get a diffrent variations for the starting dates of the calendar then you had before. (multiple outcomes on the same calendar).

ill try and fish that pice of video where i heard that theory.

but i agree it dosent end with 2012, if it does it means we are out of tune with our enviroment.


reply posted on 23-8-2009 @ 12:35 PM by dragonridr
reply to post by bsbray11



So if I'm understanding you correctly according to your own words.You have no ides whats going to happen in 2012. You said you don't believe astrological alignment is important since i showed its nothing unusual happening in 2012. Yet you came in here to say a significant event will occur again which you have no idea what it will be. Then you want to shift the topic to some new age existential garbage about enlightenment thats supposedly going to occur.If you want to talk about your beliefs this is the wrong forum the topic of this thread was about the 2012 myth with its multiple end of the world scenarios (in case you didn't watch the video).


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 01:43 PM by bsbray11
Originally posted by dragonridr
So if I'm understanding you correctly according to your own words.You have no ides whats going to happen in 2012. You said you don't believe astrological alignment is important since i showed its nothing unusual happening in 2012.


I really don't know either way if there is going to be some kind of alignment in 2012, or what the Mayans based their calendar on, even though I know they had knowledge of astronomy and used that to base all their time. But yes, the alignments matter little to me.

Yet you came in here to say a significant event will occur again which you have no idea what it will be.


I didn't say I have no idea what's happening. I said very precisely, a change in consciousness is happening. You are using consciousness to talk to me right now. The ways in which we interact with reality are going to change fundamentally, it is happening now, and by its infectious and evolutionary nature it will continue to happen. It happened to me, it has happened to many other people here that can tell you about it, but it will not happen to everyone (many people will simply die) and it has not happened to you yet. It's happened before, sporadically, around different parts of the world at different times, but never on such a globally-accelerated rate due to greatly increased access to information in the modern age. Someone said it is like a virus, they are very right. In a similar vein, William S. Burroughs once said that "Language is a virus from outer space." Then the internet and mass information exchange is the virus on steroids.

Then you want to shift the topic to some new age existential garbage about enlightenment thats supposedly going to occur.If you want to talk about your beliefs this is the wrong forum


Actually it's not. This is a 2012 forum. So I post about what 2012 is symbolically associated with.

the topic of this thread was about the 2012 myth with its multiple end of the world scenarios (in case you didn't watch the video).


Penn and Teller are asses. I'm not saying that means they're wrong, I'm just saying, they have awful attitudes, and they use them to sell their product. They target a certain emotionally distressed audience that responds favorably to their hostility, and identifies with it. I am not interested in end of the world theories regarding 2012. Many people are not, but are still interested in 2012. The way you resonate with negative emotions like Penn and Teller's attitudes has more to do with the topic at hand than the end of the world imo. The more you resonate with negative feelings, the more attracted/fascinated you will become with them and the more they will exist in your life.

[edit on 25-8-2009 by bsbray11]



reply posted on 28-8-2009 @ 01:38 PM by rush969
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to
post by zerbot565



It doesnt work like a leap year but my no means does the mayan calender end on 2012.

Maya stelae occasionally show dates beyond 2012. Most of these are in the form of "distance dates", where a Long Count date is given with a distance date to be added. For example, on the Tablet of Inscriptions from Palenque the following Long Count date was found: 9.8.9.13.0 8 Ahau 13 Pop (24 March 603 Gregorian) with a distance date of 10.11.10.5.8. The resulting date is given as 1.0.0.0.0.8 5 Lamat 1 Mol, or 21 October 4772 – almost 3,000 years into the future. The king Pacal of Palenque predicted that on this date the eightieth Calendar Round anniversary of his accession will be celebrated, suggesting he did not believe the world would end in 2012.


Congratulations dragonridr.
I believe this should have brought an end to this discussion.
What would be the point of exploring dates after “the end of the world”?
Obviously the calendar would have to terminate on that date.
This whole thing just shows how us humans tend to cling to this kind of idea and fall into the web of opportunistic pseudo intellectuals or pseudo scientists who actually are after our money. Why we listen to these “cookoos” instead of the real scientists (as shown in the Penn & T. video) is incredible?
I really enjoyed the videos. Had a good laugh.
And after 12-21-2012, we could start a poll on dates for the next EOTW.
My guess would be 12-31-2099.
Cheeriooooo.......
:
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russians know, We assume, NASA is silent ...
  Posted 10 days ago with 35 member flags
Are we paying attention enough? Strange Sounds in the sky
  Posted 17 days ago with 33 member flags
Sun flares affect our pineal gland, causing mass awakening?
  Posted 2 days ago with 33 member flags
Bring Your Toothbrush? A Journey To The Stars...
  Posted 8 days ago with 23 member flags
2012 Believers are the Definition of Sheeple
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
Tell me to stop
  Posted 7 days ago with 11 member flags
The Chevy Silverado 2012 Mayan Apocalpse Commercial
  Posted 7 days ago with 10 member flags