National Geographic - 9/11 Science and Conspiracy Special 8/31/09, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 20-8-2009 @ 10:24 PM by bsbray11
reply to post by guitarhero4rox



They probably will not even have theories worth debunking. I would be surprised to see a reference to the publication on thermitic material being found, for example, or FEMA even finding eutectic corrosion on the steel.


reply posted on 21-8-2009 @ 06:16 AM by CameronFox
reply to post by SkipStorm



Skip ~

I am quite certain it will be on YouTube the day after it airs.


reply posted on 21-8-2009 @ 05:21 PM by CameronFox
reply to post by SPreston



Did you start that thread? Typically I stand clear of your threads Spreston. They lack substance, facts, or any pertinent information.

By the way, do you know who Joe Ferguson is? He was killed on 911 when the plane he was a passenger in struck the Pentagon. Joe Ferguson was the director of geography education outreach at the National Geographic Society. He was on flight 77 with 3 elementary children on a National Geographic sponsored field trip.

Was the God damn National Geographic controlled media in on it too? HAd elementary children killed?



reply posted on 21-8-2009 @ 06:49 PM by SPreston
posted by CameronFox
reply to
post by SPreston



By the way, do you know who Joe Ferguson is? He was killed on 911 when the plane he was a passenger in struck the Pentagon.


Calling CameronFox. YoooHooo. No plane hit the Pentagon CameronFox, so come back down to earth, and rejoin reality. No people crashed into the Pentagon on the plane that never was. It was all a fantasy. Your precious delusion has evaporated.

Waving your hands and screaming wildly like a girl will not work.


reply posted on 21-8-2009 @ 07:10 PM by Seventh
Excellent stuff, there`s nothing like a documentary to find out all those hard to acquire answers....

1). Why was national security protocols not adhered to.
2). How did Bush see on T.V the 1st plane crash as it happened.
3). Why did he mention explosives in his live speech.
4). Why were 503 first responders and Rodriquez not asked to attend the `omission.
5). Why was WTC7 not deemed important enough to mention at the `omission.
6). The C.I.A. are trained to notice adverse movement on the stock exchange that could involve terrorism, terrorists favourite weapons are vehicles used as or carrying explosives, airports and planes yield fantastic results.....



The Bloomberg News reported that put options on the airlines surged to the phenomenal high of 285 times their average, a huge clue here, and with the impending Norad war games approaching, it would be an absolute retard not to notice this huge in your face clue.
7). An interview with the alleged correspondent whom supplied the incorrect news report to the B.B.C.
8). This was a major crime scene, why was it not treated at as such, again a complete disregard of normal protocols.
9). Why was the rear 1 of 3 explosions from the South Tower WTC2, completely different in both flames and smoke as the other two in identical surrounds.
10). Why did John Gross and NIST say there was no evidence of molten steel, even though there were plenty.
11). Why wasn`t the emphasis of the collapses with all the evidence at hand not put down to what can clearly be seen to cause them, and more testing done as such, explosives, this does not mean it was an inside job, terrorists managed before and here they are again, why was it deemed not worthy investigating a lot more thoroughly.
12). Why if this is a war against terrorism and by all accounts very much Saudi Arabian related, has war not been declared on Saudi also, has this anything to do with John O`neil being told to back off (whole can of worms to be opened here tbh).
13). Why was war declared on Afghanistan after America could not offer evidence that Bin laden was behind it.
14). Why was everyone of importance at the respective targets not there that day ie Bush, Silverstein, are the main two but if this side had the investigation it warrants there would be alarming similarities.
15). Why has Khalid Sheik Mohammad never been brought to justice.
16). Why was President Bush allowed to continue reading to a grade school class in Florida while the nation was under attack.
17). If Al Qaeda really is this well financed, world-wide terror organization, why have there not been any single incidents of small, cheap, normal acts of sabotage and terrorism in the US, with it’s nearly open borders.
18). Why hasn`t Republican presidential candidate and Senate Armed Services Ranking Member John McCain’s wife Cindy Hensley McCain been investigated regarding her stock market activities (namely put options) just prior to 9/11.
19). In depth interviews with patriots for truth.
20). And Rodriquez.

That will do for now, this programme can do one of two things it can sidestep these issues and many more, or do it professionally and get answers, either way it`s a win-win situation for the Truthers. A seemingly avoidance of asking or completely disregarding all the anomalies will only fuel the fires more, whilst at the same time opening more eyes = profit, or the world finally gets to see the truth = huge profit.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 8 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags