It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
May was pulled over for an expired tag on his car. When the officer walked up to him, he noticed something white in May's mouth. May said it was breath mints, but the officer thought it was crack coc aine.
"He took them out of my mouth and put them in a baggy and locked me up [for] possession of coc aine and tampering with evidence," May explained.
The officer claimed he field-tested the evidence and it tested positive for drugs. The officer said he saw May buying drugs while he was stopped at an intersection.
He also stated in his report May waived his Miranda rights and voluntarily admitted to buying drugs.
May said that never happened.
"My client never admitted he purchased crack coc aine. Why would he say that?" attorney Adam Sudbury said.
While May was behind bars, the Kissimmee Police Department towed his car and auctioned it off. He lost his job and was evicted. Now May is suing the city for false arrest and false imprisonment. He wants to be compensated for the loss of his car and job.
So the officer lied about the field test or did the field test really yield a positive?
He also stated in his report May waived his Miranda rights and voluntarily admitted to buying drugs.
May was thrown in jail and was unable to bond out for three months. He didn't get out until he received a letter from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the State Attorney's Office that test results showed no drugs were found.
Originally posted by chiron613
Doesn't anyone find it suspicious that this looks like such an obvious, blatant violation of civil rights? Like the police can't tell the difference between mints and crack coc aine? Like, the police are such idiots that they simply cannot distinguish the two? We all know crack has that minty fresh smell, right?
The field test for coc aine is not 100% reliable. In fact, no test is, but the field test is nothing more than a preliminary quick test. If it gives a positive reading, there is cause to hold the guy, pending a more definitive test. That takes more time. If the guy can't make bail, he sits in jail awaiting the test results or his trial. Harsh, but that's how it works.
Sure, this cop might have been trying to nail the guy for drugs for no reason. But it's more likely that he figured the guy ate some crack (after the cop thought he witnessed a sale), then chased it with mints to hide the fact. Who knows? The point is, it wasn't altogether unreasonable, given the circumstances, for the cop to suspect some sort of drug possibility.
Once the field test showed positive, everything else more or less falls into place. Many of us, spending three months in jail, would lose everything. We'd lose our jobs and be evicted, etc. I'm not sure about the car. I don't see how that was legally auctioned off, since the guy hadn't been convicted of a crime. Possibly it had to do with the parking laws.
To be honest, I'm not even sure this guy has a legitimate cause of action here. I'm not convinced the police did anything outside the law.