posted on Aug, 20 2009 @ 06:21 PM
I have been an ATS lurker for a while, this is my first post , so I am a bit nervous.. .
What is really interesting to me, is how the issue of to take or not to take the swine flu vaccination, which we know will contain toxic compounds
and increase the risk of GBS can be twisted back and logically made to seem only the dissenters will refuse vaccination and die.
It seems obvious to me that the reason the Georgia guidestones lists the “sustainable” population number at 500 million, is not that the earth
cannot sustain more than 500 million, which is clearly in error, but rather that 500 million is a much more controllable number by the global elite
than over 6 billion currently alive. The Georgia guidestone should read “controllable” population rather than sustainable population to be
accurate. The only power that we will ever have against them is our current numbers.
It also appears to me that the reason that the shots must be given in a series is to achieve a delayed response so the first round at least will
appear, for a while, to be safe. If the first round is not a bio-weapon, but instead an immunosuppressant, either the second shot, or a later
influenza that a person with a normal immune response would have survived might take the victims of the first shot out. Of course the mainstream
media would vastly inflate the numbers of dead and dying, just as they did in Mexico, in order to stampede people into rolling up their sleeve.
Playing with viruses, particularly influenza virus is like playing with fire because of the unpredictable nature of the mutations. Some have used
the argument that it is easier to inoculate the people whom you wish to survive rather than inoculate to kill those you wish dead. The problem with
that argument is that if a true killer is released, even if TPTB have an antiviral or vaccination that works, in roughly 6 months, that solution may
no longer be useful and the virus could turn on them. The more workable solution is something that will impede the normal protective immune response
against a much weaker virus, or the direct injection of a more lethal virus that is not easily transmitted from human to human like H5N1 which has a
roughly 60% mortality rate, but does not easily transmit from person to person.
Another option is to permanently damage the immune system by the inoculations, and let nature take its course. In the meantime, sick people are
much less combative than well ones, so other plans such as train rides might go more smoothly.
The shots might also be an experiment with nanotechnology, especially on children and pregnant women, who normally do not receive experimental drugs.
Anyone who thinks that the evil creatures behind the shadow governments of the one World Order would not harm either children or pregnant women is
living in a more pleasant delusion than reality. One only needs to look at the history of starvation and genocide, to see that inhumane treatments
were also applied to both children and pregnant women.
In fact, if the chief goal is to reduce populations rapidly, removing women of reproductive age is the fastest and most effective form of future
population reduction. The next quickest and effective way is to remove children. Don’t worry though, the global elitist’s wives and children
will not be getting the same treatment, only the useless eaters.
All of the above is just my opinion, for whatever its worth.
[edit on 20-8-2009 by ofthepeople]
[edit on 20-8-2009 by ofthepeople]