It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Chlorine dioxide and chlorine are not the same. Chlorine is a chemical element. In ion form, chlorine is part of common salt and other compounds, and necessary to most forms of life, including human. A powerful oxidizing agent, it is the most abundant dissolved ion in ocean water, and readily combines with nearly every other element, including sodium to form salt crystals, and magnesium, as magnesium chloride.
Chlorine dioxide is a chemical compound that consists of one chlorine ion bound to two ions of oxygen.
Then it still results the same - All those who don't trust the government and get the jab, will be the only ones to have kids who will then be raised with the same viewpoint and wage a war against TPTB, later on.
After scientist and science writer Forrest Mims described University of Texas ecologist Eric Pianka's speech to the Texas Academy of Science in which he expressed a longing for an ebola virus to wipe out 90 percent of the world's population, Pianka's defenders quickly went on the attack, claiming that Mims had wantonly misrepresented Pianka.
But several lines of evidence suggest that Mims described Pianka's speech quite accurately. James Redford provides an excellent one-stop post of these various lines of evidence here. William Dembski reports on a UT professor corroborating Mims' account, as does Richard Pearcey here. Our original posts on the subject are here and here.
The real news story in this case isn't that a lone scientist, Pianka, expressed such alarming views. The academic establishment has had more than its share of Pianka's sort for years. The frightening thing is that he was apparently given a standing ovation for his holocaust dream by numerous members of the Texas Academy of Science, who even voted him the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist. Source
The federal government and a private laboratory say they have no duty under Florida law to protect the public from anthrax or other lethal materials. www.wwsb.com...
Originally posted by Mr_XIM
Just more scare tatics by someone trying to make a dollar, this is just garbage, the vaccine will help keep you from getting sick people, it's your choice, but don't believe this garbage. They are doing the best they can to get a hold of this flu before fall gets here and the vaccine is just another way they are trying to help you!
Take the vaccine shot, it could be your only hope!
Originally posted by above
There will be two diseases. The first one will make you sick, the second one kills. Thats why there are two rounds of vaccines.
If you refuse to take vaccines you become sick and then you die.
if you refuse the first one but take the second one after you have become sick you will likely survive. This marks you as a potential troublemaker and you will be sent to fema.
if you take both, you will be fine
This i read somewhere here on ATS
Originally posted by daveinok
Has anyone considered the idea that the vaccine is really.....................
just a vaccine? Seriously, if you were going to kill people off with a vaccine, wouldn't you need to inject everyone right around the same time. As it stands, different parts of the world will be getting shots at wide time intervals. So when people start dropping like flies in Australia for example, countries who haven't had the shots yet will refuse to take them. Also, I liked the poster that mentioned their uncle's friend, or friend's uncle, whichever was the case. That one cracked me up, as if this top secret conspiracy to kill off a sizeable portion of the world's population was simply casually discussed around the water cooler at the White House.
[edit on 20-8-2009 by daveinok]