It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by john124
Yes I know that, I have a degree in physics lol, i put that in my picture lol, its a vector quantiity and he equates it to a scalar, namely they drake equation. he is a HOAX
Originally posted by Resinveins
Lovely.
Now will someone please draw up an equation that measures the amount of credibility you lose the closer you get to Stan Romanek?
Please?
Originally posted by kroms33
reply to post by TheAmused
I am not sure what to make of this guy. The 'Alien in the window" video seems hokey - but his mathematical equations are 'out of this world.'
I watched a special about UFOs the other night, either 20/20 or Dateline - can't remember... what caught my attention was the level of almost (ALMOST) serious investigation that was being pushed out by the MSM about UFOs and Stan Romanek.
I am not a skeptic, but a firm believer that we are being visited (but trying to sift through the BS new age wackos) - I am on the fence with this Stan guy. Good post.
S&F!
Peace,
kroms33
Originally posted by Aggie Man
I could scribble down a bunch of symbols, pass them off as intergalactic mathematics and it can't be debunked. They can not be debunked because we have to know the variables being represented, which they don't. I watched that Nightline episode and the mathematician stated that it appears as though Stan Romanek may have opened a physics book and flipped through the pages, randomly writing down variables from numerous equations....and making up some of his own.
Just my 2-cents
Originally posted by Oreyeon
In his defense though, the Nightline show was just another debunking show. They were borderline making fun of the people that they were interviewing. Like how the one lady scientist said she was 100% positive that none of these people were abducted because they "All" start out in bed, and that it was nothing but sleep paralysis. Well, evidently, no one ever told her about Travis Walton. And what about the marks, scars, and implants. You don't get that kind of stuff from sleep paralysis.
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Oreyeon
In his defense though, the Nightline show was just another debunking show. They were borderline making fun of the people that they were interviewing. Like how the one lady scientist said she was 100% positive that none of these people were abducted because they "All" start out in bed, and that it was nothing but sleep paralysis. Well, evidently, no one ever told her about Travis Walton. And what about the marks, scars, and implants. You don't get that kind of stuff from sleep paralysis.
BUT, can that mathematician that was on Nightline be debunked?
Just sayin'
Originally posted by Oreyeon
Yes, she can. Simply by the fact that she was not there, or that she was not the one experiencing any of the events in question. She's making claims based on personal opinion. Just because she has a degree or a PHD doesn't automatically make her right about everything. Alot of the abductees are on the same side of that coin. So it's all subjective. But then there are the abductees who have physical evidence to present that shows that something has happened to them. Yet they are still ignored and persecuted. The bottom line is that no one is going to believe anything until it happens to them personally, and even then so many people have their heads so far up their own asses, that it wouldn't matter anyways.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Microwaves work by manipulating electron spins.
What if the formula shown is a specific magnetic property of an element that can produce energy when subjected to a changing magnetic field?
Vibrating or manipulating the Nucleus in a certain way and "bouncing" an electron from shell to shell.
Originally posted by tmayhew01
Not saying I don't believe in UFO's, but Stans evidence just seems fishy...
I mean he did fail a polygraph test.... That just indicates RED FLAG for me...
Announcement of Stan Romanek Polygraph Results