posted on Aug, 18 2009 @ 06:39 PM
Here is a story about what the Australia's federal government (probably less "federal" than America's but that is another story) is considering in
the way of more draconian "anti"-terror laws.
I am so ticked I had to respond, even though it was hard even to find an Australian [s] propaganda
[/s] news site that would even
provide moderated commentary.
The following is what I posted (typos included):
So if Australia has institutions and other organizations that uses "aversives" or even advocate hatred and dehumanization of the neurodiverse
(typical of most AmerKKKan media organizations), they will be shut down or get taken over by authorities that will force them to clean up their act
right? Isn't it illegal to terrorize and promote hatred of minorities? Or are these wrong-dishonourable hypocrites who intend to arbitrarily
enforce laws (or build in an arbitrary bias into the laws)? If the latter would it violate some treaty Australia has ratified with some supranational
organization or conflict with its constitution or judicial precedents?
What if Dr. Matthew Israel of the infamous Judge Rotenberg Center steps on Autralian soil?
I am more worried about crossing a busy intersection or Governments Gone Wild than "terrorists" as so conveniently politically defined. I dare you
not to remove this comment.
After posting the above to the site I saw the following:
Your comment has been accepted and will appear on the website as soon as it is approved.
I'll be surprised if it ever appears.