It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
Originally posted by jthomas
They weren't B-17s.
And why do you keep inventing scenarios to fit conclusions you want?
They were some kind of bomber (B-25). If you knew, then why didn't you just say so? What's your little game?
Trying different scenarios is a legitimate investigative approach. I guess you didn't know that.
Originally posted by jprophet420
I guess it makes you mad that you can't defend the government story with anything solid. Have a nice read. (you won't)
posted by ipsedixit
If it continued to bank hard right, could it actually have landed on runway 15/33?
I doubt it.
But the 9-11 perps could sure make it look like the decoy aircraft, which had just flown Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo, had just taken off from Reagan to witnesses across the Potomac to the east, or was going to land to witnesses west of the Potomac, who would all immediately return their eyes to the Hollywood Special Effects spectacle rising above the Pentagon.
At five miles out, the Secret Service calls Reagan Tower.
Originally posted by jprophet420
reply to post by jthomas
I have presented the evidence to you and you can do what you want with it. If you say there is no government story you are literally retarded or in denial. That is not an insult, that is a cold hard fact. If you can't understand that I am sorry but I do not know why you repeatedly post here. I really don't think you are retarded but sometimes you seriously act as if your i.q. was that of a young child. To say there is no "official story" is one thing, to say there is no government story is blatant ignorance.
Originally posted by SPreston
But the 9-11 perps could sure make it look like the decoy aircraft, which had just flown Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo...
...waiting for you to point out the manipulation of the facts ...
...but please dont forget to squeeze your engines through that hole tto, because they never even left a mark or scratch on the Pentagon...
Originally posted by joey Canoli
Due to the presence of smoke and firefighting operations after the explosion at the Pentagon, no single photograph shows the full extent of the damage to the facade before the collapse of the overhanging section. However, the maximum extent of punctures to the facade have been determined by compositing a number of photographs. This process allows us to determine the dimensions of the region with punctured walls:
-about 96 feet wide across the first floor
-about 18 feet wide across the second floor
-about than 26 feet high in the center
-The entire width of impacted facade measured at least 140 feet.....
-The entire width of the impact hole from column lines 8 to 18 is approximately 96 feet. The entire width of the damaged facade from column lines 5 to 20 is about 140 feet.
Originally posted by benoni
This is a photo of the impact site of the Pentagon before it collapsed.
Which plane might this be? Following close behind the alleged "AA77"?
So, how valid is this account? It doesn't support either story, and is a sole account. Not very good at all.