posted on Aug, 18 2009 @ 05:34 PM
Another thing that annoys me about the OP's embedded video is that we find Hoffman of all people, suggesting that people look at plane crashes
A video within the video shows a military jet crashing into a hardened wall of a type proposed for nuclear power stations. It is implied that the
plane disintegrated against the wall when in fact, a careful viewing of this portion of the video will show that the plane penetrated the wall
and did not disintegrate.
Check 7:06 of the video where you will see the outer edge of the wing go right through the wall.
I don't know if Hoffman put this video together or if he intended that test of a military jet colliding with the wall as an illustration of his
point, but it certainly is no such thing. If anything it "proves" in Hoffman's terms that there should have been plenty of wreckage of a Boing
airliner inside the Pentagon.
Of course, at the Pentagon the wings didn't penetrate the wall and there is no evidence that they broke up on the outside either. Mike Walter, who
saw the whole thing, said they folded back and were dragged into the building by the fuselage.
Hoffman should get on ATS and have to endure a few good bitch slappings to sharpen him up, the way most of us have had to, on both sides of the 9/11
[edit on 18-8-2009 by ipsedixit]