Another Look at Public Nudity, page 3

reply to post by Jomina

---

To be honest, it all needs to start with the basic thought of, why do all you poor gals have to keep your breasts covered at all times? Where is the fairness in it?

It's all about keeping the cost of motor insurance down.

Originally posted by moocowman
reply to post by Jomina

---

To be honest, it all needs to start with the basic thought of, why do all you poor gals have to keep your breasts covered at all times? Where is the fairness in it?

It's all about keeping the cost of motor insurance down.

ahahah well played, moo, well played!

I guess that it's an acceptable trade off.. us guys get to go topless whenever we wish, women get the lower insurance payments.

I still think we get the bad end of the deal there lol

reply to post by St Vaast

---

Apples and oranges, though IMO. Yes of course there are tribes that will engage in at least toplessness while still wearing a loin cloth or what not. But our society is entirely different. I don't have issues with nude beaches or nude resorts but within the general populace, yes.

Let's face it, in the more developed countries, regardless of religion, clothing has been conditioned. To introduce it to us now because some tribe somewhere is happy as a clam doesn't fit for us.

Also, you point out they still wear something to cover their loins. In my opinion, that is not full nudity. I 'cover my loins' at the beach by wearing a bikini and nobody would say I was engaging in public nudity.

reply to post by 12m8keall2c

---

You're talking to a germ freak here. And I know what you're getting at. People don't have to be a nudist for things like bodily fluid residue to get about. Again, germ freak here. I know all about what's one paper money, the toilet handle, the faucets, door handles, unpackaged candy in a dish etc., and it is enough to have me locked up in a rubber room.

But I also know what is on the toilet seats. That is not going to be on a public bench in a micscropic amount where I can pretend it isn't there because I don't see it. That is going to be visible. Please think of what all goes on 'down there' with both the male and female bodies. Accidents as well. Again, I'm not trying to be crude but I'm thinking menstrual blood, fecal matter, pubic hair, urine, seminal fluid, vaginal discharge in public seating?

I think that is what makes the difference between the naughties who don't wash their hands after using a public restroom then dip their hands into the cucumber slices in the salad bar and a nudist who sat in a chair before me.

Germs are everywhere but can you see that this would at least be a more noticeable problem if public nudity became the norm?

Socratic question: () Why do bathing suit companies ask us to keep our undies on when trying on a bathing suit?

Microscopic germs and so other patrons don't soil them with bodily fluids.

reply to post by AshleyD

---

Fair enough. Let's all work to make loin cloths fashionable again... or at least kilts and battle bikini's.

Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by St Vaast

---

Apples and oranges, though IMO. Yes of course there are tribes that will engage in at least toplessness while still wearing a loin cloth or what not. But our society is entirely different. I don't have issues with nude beaches or nude resorts but within the general populace, yes.

Let's face it, in the more developed countries, regardless of religion, clothing has been conditioned. To introduce it to us now because some tribe somewhere is happy as a clam doesn't fit for us.

Also, you point out they still wear something to cover their loins. In my opinion, that is not full nudity. I 'cover my loins' at the beach by wearing a bikini and nobody would say I was engaging in public nudity.

I agree that our society is entirely different. The question of course, is 'why' ?

I disagree with your argument that 'because some tribe somewhere is happy as a clam doesn't fit for us'. How do we know it doesn't fit for us? We haven't tried it.

Are we afraid to try it ? Are we afraid of being seen for what we are, instead of hiding behind artifice ? Are we afraid to see others as they are ?

After all, penisis are as unremarkable as tongues or elbows. Labia are as unremarkable as toes.

You speak of men's 'junk' and bodily secretions as being something you wish no contact with as result of general nudity. Yet don't noses drip and dribble and require to be 'blown', often in crowded public transport ?

This is all purely hypothetical, this discussion of general public nudity, but if we had all become accustomed, from infancy onwards, to seeing naked people in the same way we're accustomed to clothed people, so many of our attitudes and behaviours would be different to as they are.

For example, if, since childhood, we had grown accustomed to seeing people's nether regions in the act of clambering up the steps of a bus, or into a vehicle, we would accept genitalia in the same way we currently accept the sight of people's elbows. And wouldn't we be the better for that ? Wouldn't it mean that young guys wouldn't spend half their youth with a 'dirty' magazine beneath the sheets ? Wouldn't it mean that when they met a girl, they'd value her for her real qualities, rather than the size of her breasts ? And wouldn't that bode well when people married ? Wouldn't it benefit children of that marriage ? Wouldn't it mean relationships were less superficial and had more substance, more worthwhile foundation ?

For example, I watched the first in a series about a couple who'd become famous in the US upon the multiple birth of their six children. At one point, the couple were seated on a couch and the husband said, in relation to his wife's changed appearance words to the effect: ' When I met her she had long blonde hair. Then it got shorter. And shorter. Then it changed colour.' The interviewer asked something and the husband replied: ' I only like blondes'. Now this was a man who had recently become father to eight children all under age 3. Alongside him sat his wife who'd given birth to his eight children. She was still highly attractive, but in addition she was nurturing eight very young children, running and organising a home. Yet he preferred blondes with long wavy hair. I would have expected any man who'd fathered eight babies (and who had their welfare, support, futures to consider) to have different priorities and to regard the mother of his children as cloven to his body by that time .. to feel part of her, rather than concerned about the colour and length of her hair. I do believe that men even a hundred years ago would have cut off their tongue if it had uttered something as idiotic, under the circumstances.

But then, a hundred years ago, men weren't having artificial silicone calf muscles surgically inserted in their legs so they'd appear more muscular and masculine, nor would they have regarded as sane any woman who'd had bags of saline inserted in their chest wall.

General public nudity would be resisted, in my opinion, NOT because of any moral objection but because of general public vanity. And perhaps because of this, we all need to get in touch with the reality of naked bodies, in all their ages and stages.

reply to post by St Vaast

---

Hey St. Vaast. Great post- and I actually am not in disagreement. So

Unlike the general discussion of the thread that is focusing on the social factor, I'm more interested in the health factor. So I was kind of trying to avoid the general public nudity debate where we just bandy around 'What's the big deal?' and discuss a new angle.

If I saw a nude couple on a public bench, to be honest my first opinion would be 'Eek! A nude couple is sitting on a bench.' lol But right after that I'd be wondering what they left behind. So for me I'm not really worried about the 'prude factor.' I love minimal clothing personally. But I don't want to see public seating turned into what I see on a public toilet. That's what I'm getting at.

reply to post by AshleyD

---

My "point" being, merely, ... you could "come into contact" with "them" quite haphazardly if not Even unbeknownst ... all the while, and being none the wiser.

Much the same as the checkout stand at any local market.

nudists People Everywhere.



fwiw:
I know you Know ... just yanking your chain a bit, that's all.



Me?
There are more pressing and important issues and/or concerns to fret ourselves over.

Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 1 days ago with 18 member flags

Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags

Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags

Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags

Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags

Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags

Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: