My State is a rather progressive State. We are full of Conservatives and Liberals alike, but no matter what side of the fence you are standing on, we
all agree that the best laws are few laws. We pride ourselves on being progressive, and eagerly take up causes based on ideals. Because of that,
Political Researchers, Think Tanks, and Pundits have not been able to successfully, pigeon-hole, peg, or predict what our State will do next. As such,
the Nation looks to our State to determine future trends in the Nation.
My State does not have any laws against Public Nudity. However, they do not have any laws protecting Public Nudity either. Instead, they leave it up
to the individual municipalities to regulate, as long as their regulations are not unconstitutionally vague.
One of our more progressive cities has had laws allowing Public Nudity for quite some time. This had been pretty much a non-issue as there were no
Nudists in that city for those years. Then, in 2004, after a Nudist moved to town and routinely rode her bicycle around naked, locals would chuckle
and think it quirky, but no one really minded. That is, until Tourist Season came, and the Nudist wanted to take part in the 4th of July Parade. The
City Council, afraid of what kind of message this would send to the tourists which comprise 4 times the city's population (and something like 10
times the revenue), insisted that the Public Nudity laws did not apply to the Parade. The local population fought tooth and nail against the City
Council on the issue. Protests and Sit-ins were conducted, sparks and harsh words flew, but in the end the City won. They modified the Public Nudity
laws, to ensure no further incidents, to require Public Nudity to cover genitalia (and apparently nipples qualify legally as genitalia too...go
figure) in the downtown area.
So, everything calmed down for a while until Nudist number 2 moves to town. He routinely would walk around town and shop in the buff. The guy was
harmless and everyone knew it, although he certainly wasn't pleasant to observe, none of us felt we needed to cover our childrens' eyes (my 12 year
old daughter was probably by far the most vocal in town towards him, and would often tell him "
EWWW! d00d, I did *NOT* need to see
that!"). One day, he is walking down the bike-path in the buff, minding his own business when a nearby Elementary lets out. Someone picking up
their kid from school noticed him passing by naked as a jay-bird, and called the Police. The Police looked into it and concluded that it was a matter
of innocently bad timing, but no harm was intended by the guy, and he wasn't exposing himself to the children or doing anything in a sexual manner.
Nevertheless, the City Council has decided that something needs to be done to further restrict the Nudity Laws to "protect" the children.
Another Look at Public Nudity
In the time it took for this issue to make it to the City Council, both of the town's Nudists have moved elsewhere. There are no longer any Nudists
in the city. However, the issue is still a charged one. Like I said, we are a very progressive State, Conservative and Liberal alike, and we don't
particularly like having laws and will fight them tooth-and-nail on idealistic grounds. So, even though there are no Nudists left to protect, the
people have taken up the banner and have begun having daily sit-ins naked on the City Civic Center. Already there is talk about starting a State-wide
Initiative to protect Public Nudity since everyone knows that the City Council is more concerned with Public Image to the Tourists than to it's
constituents.
Leave it up to my State to fight a battle for the hypothetical Rights of people who may one day wish to exercise those Rights, even if there aren't
any right now that wish to do such!
So, why must we hide Nudity from our children when it is not presented in a sexual manner? (And the Police that the Mayor keeps on a very short leash
can easily discern the difference between someone who is illegally exposing themselves from those just practicing their right to be Publicly Nude.) If
only one prude has issue with it, then why must we take away that right from everyone? Isn't the battle-cry of "protect the children" getting
pretty old? My 12 year old daughter agrees that it is disgusting to see an old man wandering around town naked, but she isn't scared from it, nor is
she bothered enough to want to take away his right to do such (although she insists that she'll respect their right to be naked so long as they
respect her right to voice her opinion about their nakedness). Why do we cling to this Puritan and Victorian stigma about Nudity still? It just seems
so 17th century to me.
[edit on 18-8-2009 by fraterormus]