I've been combing the web for the past while trying to find a legal way I can show you this footage but I've had trouble. So those of you in the
US should go through to THIS LINK and portal to the Monsterquest page to view the episode I am about to discuss.
I know many of you have given up hope regarding the professionalism and quality of Monsterquest, but I still watch it on a weekly basis and was
stunned when they finally managed to prove something of drastic importance.
Several weeks ago an episode was aired called 'Crucial Evidence' that purported to finally prove once and for all that the Patterson film was
genuine. I had my doubts, but am so impressed by what they proved and discovered that this thread is going to be a quick presentation of the key
points for those of you who do not watch the show.
Point 1 - Mid-Tarsal Break
This joint in the centre of a primate's foot is one of the key points aired in this episode. A recent discovery, this trait that allows a foot to
bend the opposite direction of a humans, is native to only non-human primates.
Move your foot for a second. Put your heel on the floor and your toes in the air. Now place your foot flat on the floor. Try to keep your toes on the
floor and bend the back of your foot upwards. Your foot arches in the centre to try and do this. With a Mid-Tarsal Break, the foot simply bends at the
centre, leaving the toes and fleshy front of the foot flat on the floor.
Several purportedly real Sasquatch tracks were analyzed with this unique trait in mind, and it was found that they showed the characteristics of
having a mid-tarsal break. According to MQ, less than 6 experts in the US would have the knowledge to accurately create this generally unrecognized
trait in a primate's foot.
How does this translate to the Patterson footage? The walking motion. The toes are planted on the ground, and then the rear of the foot hinges upwards
before the foot lifts off the ground. A mid-tarsal break. This CANNOT be reproduced by a human foot without breaking the bones.
Point 2 - Scale and Attributes
It has been said by many skeptics in the past that the Patterson footage could easily contain a man in a suit. They claim there is nothing in the
movement of the creature or it's limb - to - body ratio that could refute this theory. They have finally been proven wrong.
A hollywood costume design expert, who worked on such films as Night of the Living Dead, made at first a startling discovery. The Patterson film was
not actually filmed on a 25mm lens as believed all these years. Using computer algorithms and a scientific formula, he proved that the film was
actually filmed on a 15mm lens.
This automatically voids all previous analysis of the film and the creature as their calculations have now been proven wrong.
Using this new discovery, it was worked out that the creature is approximately 7ft 2inches tall.
This measurement allowed for the first ever body ratio analysis to be done on the film. It takes the height of the creature into account and
determines if a human could meet the ratio required to fit into the suit and move as shown in the video.
The result is that a human COULD NOT even fit in the suit let alone move with the gait shown in the Patterson footage. Here is why:
1) The dimensions are wrong - A humans arms and legs would not accurately fit into the legs and arms of the Patterson creature. The joints are placed
2) The eyes are in the wrong place - For a human to be in the suit, his or her head would have to be protruding from the top of the suit to be able to
see. In this case, if they were lower in the suit they would be walking blindly. This cannot be the case, as the creature looks directly at the camera
as it is walking away. How would they know where to look if they couldn't see?
3) The fur - The stretch fur required to create this suit (the skin and fur does stretch over apparent muscles as seen in the enhanced footage) was
not invented until the mid 70's.
That is basically the key points of the episode, and I STRONGLY encourage anyone with any doubts in my explanation to watch it for themselves. These
experts know their stuff, and I have researched their names and credentials online before posting this thread. They are real recognized professionals
in their fields.
I believe these facts prove once and for all that 'Patty' is not a man in a suit. It was a real, living creature.