It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OldThinker
I am there, with you...it is true...and oh, yeah, JC thought it true, too...see:
Now, when we search the New Testament Scriptures, we certainly find many interesting statements Jesus made that relate to this issue. For instance:
1. But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female (Mark 10:6).This makes it clear that Jesus taught the creation was young, for Adam and Eve existed ‘from the beginning ’–not billions of years after the universe and Earth came into existence.
Doesn't demonstrate anything you want it to demonstrate.
All it does is confirm that Jesus was an initiated Jewish male and knew the Jewish mythology as passed down in the Torah.
Why you would turn this from a "why isn't it taught"? thread to a "Jesus" thread, I'l never know.
Have you decided that you have received a satisfactory answer? IN that case why not start another thread asking "And what about theBuffaloEmpty Tomb?"
By the way, since you seem to be eager to hand out research question for others, here is one for you related to your off topic sub-plot: Does the Bible record whether Jesus was married or not? Here's a hint: the answer is much more obvious than some of your supposed proofs of 'unknowable science' recorded in the Bible.
And while I am on the topic of 'unknowable science' recorded in the Bible, we might as well have one that IS related to your topic. The Torah actually records an undeniable knowledge of an Earth that is well over 25 million years old (we know it is much older than that, but 25 mil is a loooonnnngggg way from 6000), although that is hidden a good deal deeper than any of your proofs. Put that in your research pile and find it.
Please don't come back until you have at least tried.
Originally posted by Maslo
Answer to OPs question:
Simply because its not confirmed theory backed by evidence, only a wild unproven hypothesis with religious ideologic background. It doesnt belong to science class, because only proven theories should be teached there. Like evolution.
Naturalistic Evolutionism requires that physical laws and atoms organize themselves into increasingly complex and beneficial, ordered arrangements.6 Thus, over eons of time, billions of things are supposed to have developed upward, becoming more orderly and complex.7
However, this basic law of science (2nd Law of Thermodynamics) reveals the exact opposite. In the long run, complex, ordered arrangements actually tend to become simpler and more disorderly with time. There is an irreversible downward trend ultimately at work throughout the universe. Evolution, with its ever increasing order and complexity, appears impossible in the natural world
Originally posted by OldThinker
please explain.....
"confirmed theory" Is that an oxymoron?
The word would be "LAW"
And OT doesn't see that word used much on the evolution sites/books/periodicals...
Originally posted by OldThinker
Naturalistic Evolutionism requires that physical laws and atoms organize themselves into increasingly complex and beneficial, ordered arrangements.6 Thus, over eons of time, billions of things are supposed to have developed upward, becoming more orderly and complex.7
However, this basic law of science (2nd Law of Thermodynamics) reveals the exact opposite. In the long run, complex, ordered arrangements actually tend to become simpler and more disorderly with time. There is an irreversible downward trend ultimately at work throughout the universe. Evolution, with its ever increasing order and complexity, appears impossible in the natural world.
Originally posted by Maslo
......It is simple to see why this statement is wrong, even serious creationists dont believe in such nonsense. That you linked to it only proves that you dont understand basic science so how do you want to disprove evolution?
You have no idea what you are talking about...
Every time a creationist comes up with the thermodynamics argument, god kills a puppy...
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
In short:
The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by TangoVooDoo
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
In short:
The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare.
en.wikipedia.org...
This is incorrect, is self-refuting and contradictory.
First it states "for an infinite amount of time..." How can it be stated as "time" if it's "infinite"?
Secondly, again if it is "infinite" then it could not also be a "complete" works of Shakespeare. It would of already been "completed".
In other words *IF* heaven is real then Adam died and goes to heaven and when I die I go to heaven and even though Adam dies thousands of years before me when I get to heaven we will have always been there.
Originally posted by mpriebe81
Why can't Creationists teach an alternative? It's simple really.
Separation of church and State.....it's kind of a big deal.
If people want their kids to learn about their respective religion, they should simply enroll them in a religious school, catechism, bible school, etc etc etc.
It's absolutely asinine to expect kids with different religious backgrounds to learn ONE specific religion. Which religion should be taught? And why should my tax money go to teaching something that I don't personally believe in?
Separation of church and State, the founding fathers were wise indeed.
[edit on 5-9-2009 by mpriebe81]
Originally posted by Maslo
I want to point out that infinite monkey theorem is NOT how evolution works. It only shows how random mutation might work but is missing the other important side of the coin - natural selection.
Originally posted by OldThinker
OT
PS: Where'd the:
monkey,
letters,
typewriter,
keyboard,
ink,
paper...
...come from?
Originally posted by Maslo
Originally posted by TangoVooDoo
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
In short:
The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare.
en.wikipedia.org...
This is incorrect, is self-refuting and contradictory.
First it states "for an infinite amount of time..." How can it be stated as "time" if it's "infinite"?
Secondly, again if it is "infinite" then it could not also be a "complete" works of Shakespeare. It would of already been "completed".
In other words *IF* heaven is real then Adam died and goes to heaven and when I die I go to heaven and even though Adam dies thousands of years before me when I get to heaven we will have always been there.
Why is it incorrect? Its pretty logical I think.. The mathematical proof is in the wikipedia link. The point is, as the time and number of monkeys approaches infinity, the probability of typing the wanted text approaches one. Of course, its just a thought experiment...
Whats wrong about "infinite amount of time"? And I dont understand your second paragraph...