It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Triarchic
reply to post by OldThinker
OH! I see now what you where referencing. Dude you should have just pointed that out.
how's the Dr. Ben Carson research coming?
THE OLD TESTAMENT is more than reliable!!!!
Old Testament Overview
The 39 books of the OT were written over a 1200 year period from approximately 1600 BC to 400 BC.
Starting with Moses, who wrote the first five books of the Bible, and ending with Ezra who wrote Chronicles, the OT had a wide range of writers. They all had God's inspiration and would have agreed with David's remark:
"The Spirit of the LORD spoke by me, And His word was on my tongue." ~ 2 Samuel 23:2
The OT primarily tells the story of the Jewish people from roots to riches to ruin. It contains history, law, poetry, prophecy, and personal stories.
"Your word is a lamp to my feet
And a light to my path. ...
Revive me, O LORD, according to Your word. ...
And teach me Your ordinances.
My life is continually in my hand," ~ Psalm 119:105-109
Layers of Evidences
Here, briefly are a few of the reasons that we can have absolute confidence in the accuracy of today's Old Testament:
Exacting Jewish Scribes
The OT was written and meticulously preserved in the original Hebrew language from the beginning through today. It was always considered sacred and therefore was very seriously guarded and copied with the utmost care.
The sole responsibility of the Jewish Scribes was to know, maintain, protect, and, exactly preserve the books of the OT. The levels of care that they went through is astounding:
The skin, ink, document size, and lines on the document were all clearly defined. The number, size, spacing, and length of lines and columns per skin were specified. The spacing of the letters, words, sections, and books and the point of ending books were to be exact.
The dress and cleanliness of the scribe, condition of the book being copied , and the manner in which the name for God (YWHW) was written was all specifically ordered.
When each book or section had been copied, the scribes would count and check the number of every verse, word, and letter of the manuscript. They even counted the times each letter occurred in each book, calculated the middle word and middle letter and checked the new with the old. Such detail seems extreme to us, but with this level of detail, we can know we have reliable manuscripts today.
The Dead Sea Scrolls
An amazing event occurred in 1947 with the beginning of the discovery of 931 ancient documents found in caves near the town of Qumran on the shores of the Dead Sea. The Dead Sea Scrolls:
Prove the OT Accurate
The manuscripts of the Dead Sea Scrolls date to as old as 400 BC. The OT manuscripts found are 900 to 1100 years older than the most reliable available Hebrew OT manuscripts. When the Scrolls are compared to the newer manuscripts, they prove to be amazingly accurate, nearly identical. The few differences were mostly slips of the pen, spelling changes or word substitutions (over vs. above e.g.). The extreme accuracy of the newer documents puts to death the questions of the OT reliability based on time.
Prove the cannon of the OT
The Dead Sea Scrolls contained 223 OT manuscripts! Those 223 manuscripts include 38 of the 39 books of the OT! The one book missing is Esther, but other documents there refer to the story, so we know it was part of their culture.
Non-Hebrew & Other Jewish Evidences
The following ancient documents give tremendous support for the accuracy of the OT.
The Septuagint (250 BC) is the translation of the OT into Greek. An important and powerful document, it not only gave the Jews their scriptures in the common language of the entire region, but gave non-Jews easier access to God's Word (Just in time to understand the context of Jesus' Ministry.).
The Hexapla (240 AD) is a comparative Greek/Hebrew OT with versions in 6 columns created by the Christian elder Origen.
The Samaritan Pentateuch (200 BC) is the Samaritan copy of the OT's first five books.
Aramaic Targums (200 AD) are paraphrases of the scriptures kept by Jewish communities to aid in understanding the OT.
The Mishna (200 AD) was the Law of Moses retold and explained.
The Gemara (200 AD) was an Aramaic commentary on the Law of Moses.
The Midrash (100 BC - 300 AD) are doctrinal studies of the Hebrew OT.
Evidence from History and Archeology
Substantial proof for the accuracy of the OT text comes through Archeology.
One famous Archeologist said:
"... categorically ... no archeological discovery has ever [contradicted] a Biblical reference. Scores of ... findings ... confirm in ... outline or detail the statements of the Bible."
Kingdoms, Cities, Countries, Personal Names, Battles, Kings, Languages, Writings, Laws, Religious Practices, and even the use of words have proven to be correctly described in the OT. Time and again historians have thought that the OT was wrong concerning an event (etc.) only to have the Bible prove right when the facts were known.
Prophecy in the OT has proven correct in every case expected. Hundreds of predictions have literally come true including those regarding: Edom, Tyre, Babylon, Persia, Nineveh, Israel, Greece, Jesus Christ, and many others.
Conclusion: The evidence is overwhelming (And this is far from all the evidence.). You do not have to guess or hope, you can KNOW that the Old Testament we have is true & accurate
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
I'll just say this; if there are actual facts to support any alternative, then it should be taught as a possibility. ....
Originally posted by Welfhard
.....Oh my god...
The Chaldean Flood Tablets from the city of Ur in what is now Southern Iraq, describe how the Bablylonian God Ea had decided to eliminate humans and other land animals with a great flood which was to become "the end of all flesh". He selected Ut-Napishtim, to build an ark to save a few humans, and samples of other animals.
The Babylonian text "The Epic of Galgamesh" 1,8 and the Hebrew story are essentially identical with about 20 major points in common. Their texts are obviously linked in some way.
The Babylonian tablets which contain the full story of the flood have been dated circa 650 BCE. However, portions of the story have been found on tablets from about 2000 BCE. A study of the language used in the tablets indicates that the story originated much earlier than 2000 BCE. 3 Variations of the original story have been found translated into other ancient languages.
J and P seem to have based their stories on two original stories from Mesopotamian sources, perhaps based on a massive series of floods in Ur and surrounding areas circa 2800 BCE which would be perceived by the local population as being very extensive; perhaps world wide. Alternatively, it may have been based on the catastrophic flooding of the Black Sea.
You didn't just got info from some one else did u?
I thought you HAD ALL the answers yourself?
Originally posted by Welfhard
You are supposed to 'research' the Sumerian Myths, not research what apologetic sources say about them.
Starting with apologetic and demonstrably false creationist websites isn't research - it's pretending you have the right answers to begin with.
>: /
[edit on 25-8-2009 by Welfhard]
PS: what if the stories are similiar, does that invalidate the old testament? I dunno?
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by OldThinker
PS: what if the stories are similiar, does that invalidate the old testament? I dunno?
That is an unexpectedly honest answer from you. The fact of the matter is that it implies certain things.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by OldThinker
I disagree. I think you are on a quest to backup your held paradigm. I am on a quest for facts, not truth.