Why can’t Creationists teach an alternative? Are the ‘free thinkers’ - atheists scared of som, page 2

reply to post by OldThinker

---

Is my question confusing to you?

Actually no. I answered your questions with my own questions.

I do not see any answers?

reply to post by Deaf Alien

---

DA, are you discounting TRUTH?

OT

Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to post by OldThinker

---

Is my question confusing to you?

Actually no. I answered your questions with my own questions.

I do not see any answers?

'Answers' are way above our pay-grade friend...are you looking for an argument? Not here...


This discussion is about intellectual integrity...letting all have a voice....OT's from America....home of the free/brave stuff....

reply to post by OldThinker

---

DA, are you discounting TRUTH?

The truth about what?

reply to post by OldThinker

---

Science requires evidence to substantiate its claims...something creationism doesn't have.Simple,shouldn't be taught in a science classroom.



[edit on 17-8-2009 by Solomons]

It is known that Einstein occasionally made passing reference to God, and he made some very remarkable deductions, and possessed a very keen mind. But his forebear, Sir Isaac Newton, if he had been alive during the lifetime of Einstein, might well have outshone even that masterful physicist in his technical pursuits, and might have been more outspoken about his spiritual insights.

source: www.associatedcontent.com...

And Newton would have been marginalized to teaching at Washington bible College: www.bible.edu...


Oh well, think the world would have listened then?

reply to post by OldThinker

---

'Answers' are way above our pay-grade friend...are you looking for an argument? Not here...

I'm looking for an arguement? You're the one who stared this argument, this thread.

This discussion is about intellectual integrity...letting all have a voice....OT's from America....home of the free/brave stuff....

Well, then you have no qualm about letting other people of different beliefs have a voice? You have no qualm about letting some people teach kids that earth is flat or rests on turtles in science class?

Originally posted by Solomons
reply to post by OldThinker

---

Science requires evidence to substantiate its claims...something creationism doesn't have.Simple,shouldn't be taught in a science classroom.



[edit on 17-8-2009 by Solomons]

Why...How....do you sound sooooooooo confident...with a 'hypothesis'?

Your std deviation is wanting friend.....

OT ASQ CSSBB here....

Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to post by OldThinker

---

'Answers' are way above our pay-grade friend...are you looking for an argument? Not here...

I'm looking for an arguement? You're the one who stared this argument, ......

Sweet, i gotta STAR.....OT's first

OT

Originally posted by OldThinker

It is known that Einstein occasionally made passing reference to God, and he made some very remarkable deductions, and possessed a very keen mind. But his forebear, Sir Isaac Newton, if he had been alive during the lifetime of Einstein, might well have outshone even that masterful physicist in his technical pursuits, and might have been more outspoken about his spiritual insights.

source: www.associatedcontent.com...

And Newton would have been marginalized to teaching at Washington bible College: www.bible.edu...


Oh well, think the world would have listened then?

We all know that Newton was a Christian of some sort.

But what religion was Einstein a part of?

Many scientific and mathematical discoveries were made by Muslims.

If Einstein was a Muslim, would you have subscribed to Islam?

reply to post by niteboy82

---

Honored to have you niteboy82,

Glad you posted!

OT

Originally posted by Solomons
reply to post by OldThinker

---

Science requires evidence to substantiate its claims...something creationism doesn't have.Simple,shouldn't be taught in a science classroom.
[edit on 17-8-2009 by Solomons]

Solomons,

Glad you have joined, you mean like these guys....are you ready to research their findings....AND their FRAMEWORK....????

Gerald E. Aardsma (physicist and radiocarbon dating)

Louis Agassiz (helped develop the study of glacial geology and of ichthyology)

Alexander Arndt (analytical chemist, etc.)

Steven A. Austin (geologist and coal formation expert) [more info]

Charles Babbage (helped develop science of computers / developed actuarial tables and the calculating machine)

Francis Bacon (developed the Scientific Method)

Thomas G. Barnes (physicist)

Robert Boyle (helped develop sciences of chemistry and gas dynamics)

Wernher von Braun (pioneer of rocketry and space exploration)

David Brewster (helped develop science of optical mineralogy)

Arthur V. Chadwick (geologist)

Melvin Alonzo Cook (physical chemist, Nobel Prize nominee) [more info]

Georges Cuvier (helped develop sciences of comparative anatomy and vertebrate paleontology)

Humphry Davy (helped develop science of thermokinetics)

Donald B. DeYoung (physicist, specializing in solid-state, nuclear science and astronomy) [more info]

Henri Fabre (helped develop science of insect entomology)

Michael Faraday (helped develop science of electromagnetics / developed the Field Theory / invented the electric generator)

Danny R. Faulkner (astronomer)

Ambrose Fleming (helped develop science of electronics / invented thermionic valve)

Robert V. Gentry (physicist and chemist)

Duane T. Gish (biochemist)

John Grebe (chemist)

Joseph Henry (invented the electric motor and the galvanometer / discovered self-induction)

William Herschel (helped develop science of galactic astronomy / discovered double stars / developed the Global Star Catalog)

George F. Howe (botanist)

D. Russell Humphreys (award-winning physicist)


James P. Joule (developed reversible thermodynamics)

Johann Kepler (helped develop science of physical astronomy / developed the Ephemeris Tables)

John W. Klotz (geneticist and biologist)

Leonid Korochkin (geneticist) [more info]

Lane P. Lester (geneticist and biologist)

Carolus Linnaeus (helped develop sciences of taxonomy and systematic biology / developed the Classification System)

Joseph Lister (helped develop science of antiseptic surgery)

Frank L. Marsh (biologist)

Matthew Maury (helped develop science of oceanography/hydrography)

James Clerk Maxwell (helped develop the science of electrodynamics)

Gregor Mendel (founded the modern science of genetics)

Samuel F. B. Morse (invented the telegraph)

Isaac Newton (helped develop science of dynamics and the discipline of calculus / father of the Law of Gravity / invented the reflecting telescope)

Gary E. Parker (biologist and paleontologist)

Blaise Pascal (helped develop science of hydrostatics / invented the barometer)

Louis Pasteur (helped develop science of bacteriology / discovered the Law of Biogenesis / invented fermentation control / developed vaccinations and immunizations)

William Ramsay (helped develop the science of isotopic chemistry / discovered inert gases)

John Ray (helped develop science of biology and natural science)

Lord Rayleigh (helped develop science of dimensional analysis)

Bernhard Riemann (helped develop non-Euclidean geometry)

James Simpson (helped develop the field of gynecology / developed the use of chloroform)

Nicholas Steno (helped develop the science of stratigraphy)

George Stokes (helped develop science of fluid mechanics)

Charles B. Thaxton (chemist)

William Thompson (Lord Kelvin) (helped develop sciences of thermodynamics and energetics / invented the Absolute Temperature Scale / developed the Trans-Atlantic Cable)

Larry Vardiman (astrophysicist and geophysicist)

Leonardo da Vinci (helped develop science of hydraulics)

Rudolf Virchow (helped develop science of pathology)

A.J. (Monty) White (chemist)

A.E. Wilder-Smith (chemist and pharmacology expert)

John Woodward (helped develop the science of paleontology)

reply to post by Solomons

---

Creationism doesn't have proof? lol. Would you agree that statistics is a science? Well if you do then think on this statistically speaking of course. Evolution..a theory mind you...taught as science.....hmmm. Ok life just begun. Do you know that there is a greater chance for a blind man to complete a rubics cube than life just to begin. Ok you say. Now do you know that if the world was filled with blind men shoulder to shoulder and they completed the cube at the exact same time is also more statistically to occur. Now fill our galaxy with blind men shoulder to shoulder with the cube and they complete it at the exact same time. Yep you guessed it. lol--->no evidence for Creationism.

Ex-Vatican Translator, Mauro Biglino\'s Alternative Creation/Translation Theory
  Posted 9 days ago with 40 member flags

EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 17 days ago with 24 member flags

"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags

Evolution. Not a theory, but a fact!
  Posted 19 days ago with 4 member flags

Evolutionary theory: Gaps and not yet understood phenonemon
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags

Radical Theory Explains the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life, Challenges Conventional Wisdom
  Posted 15 days ago with 3 member flags

Please be more specific about which type of creationist you\'re speaking of...
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags

Proof that the pharoes did not build the pyramids, so who did FIND OUT HERE
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: