reply to post by ProfEmeritus
Not saying one way or the other about whether Corso is for real, or the Roswell crash is for real....
... I just think your argument that; "They can't both have seeded the information to industry" is about the most absurd statement -- just on logic
alone. Yes of course, two people could be involved in "seeding" information. As much as you can copy plans for memory metal. However, today, shape
changing metals are not a big deal -- and it doesn't seem like such a big stretch to mix titanium with any alloy. The trick is probably how you
construct the materials.
Today, a lot of crystals are formed with gas deposition, and we use ionized paint to put enamel's on cars. Just little leaps in materials that make a
Now if someone were trying to dismiss the Roswell information, they would closely align themselves with TRUE information -- if there were an informant
out there revealing it, and then add a bit of nonsense so that people would discredit anything attached to it.
This was done with 9/11 and with Iran-Contra. Lot's of bogus leads to burn the press. Same thing happened to burn Dan Rather with TRUE information
that was proven a forgery (by people hired from the White House and with CBS doing a solid for the government to get some concessions from the FCC
-Standard Operating Procedure there) investigating George Bush's military AWOL status.
We've all grown up a bit since 9/11/2001. I never was a "conspiracy theorist" but ever since then, I look back at major events and I can't find
when the government told us the truth. Not on the reasons that Manuel Noriega was taken hostage, nor on the reasons for any war but WW II and the war
>> It isn't that the government was lying about Roswell -- it's that they've never told the truth unless forced to on ANYTHING. Eisenhower and
Jimmy Carter were the only fairly honest ones we've had in office.
This doesn't mean the Roswell crash can ever be "proven" one way or the other. It's a dead end. It's very much a tainted story like 9/11 --
everyone here might KNOW the truth, but it cannot be proven unless the Media adopts the story. Reality seems to be a consensus of the Water Cooler and
Perhaps we aren't a bunch of nuts, but people who cannot be hypnotized, who can't get visions of ghosts, and who don't feel any presence when in
church --- In know that's true of me. I don't just believe things because everybody tells me it's true -- but there are a few things that I suspect
without solid facts.
It seems that the chance that WE HAVE NOT been discovered by an advanced alien intelligence is actually a silly notion. Scientists recently discovered
that polarized light can indicate life on a planet (has to do with an obscure organic reaction to yellow sunlight and molecules, resulting in
right-handed peptides -- the building blocks of life). We are recently discovering that nano-holes on a material, can make light bend around an object
-- invisibility may be close at hand.
So if WE have discovered a few things that can help us find life, and make us unseen -- then it's very likely that any race with 10,000 years head
start in technology, would not only be able to find us, but could remain unseen unless they wanted to be seen.
Hence, the UFO's are probably not aliens -- if they are, then they are less advanced races maybe a 100 or more years ahead of us, or they are
terrestrial experiments by governments who don't want to share the stars with us peons.
What is the most dangerous revelation of Roswell?
That is was humans who could reach the stars. That perhaps we aren't land-locked. Perhaps we
have cures to common diseases, but only the average citizen need to endure these.
The ultimate social darwinists might be in control, and the mess we are making of the planet, the headaches we endure to live our bureaucratic,
ant-like lives as we build this pointless pyramids to capitalism -- it's all just busy work. We are kept in a state of war, in a state of fear, when
we could be reaching for the stars -- so that the elite can have more power.
Better to rule in hell than serve in heaven -- that's the philosophy of the wealthy Psychopath.
>> No, the technology described at Roswell was maybe 60 years ahead of its time -- other than the amazing propulsion of flying disk (which I probably
have a good idea how to recreate since I was 10). We have a billion stars in this one galaxy alone. Half at least may have planets. If 1 in a million
could have life,... likely there are at least a hundred, maybe a hundred thousand, chances for advanced life -- the earth sure went through a lot of
calamities and that seemed to encourage better designs when extinction levels were high.
So you will have very advanced races in the background, with hundreds of less advanced ones. Likely there is an overlap.
Humans will not be bound by mere rockets for much longer,.. so likely we will have to sign a "hands off" policy as well.
>> The LEAST likely scenario I could imagine, is that Earth has NOT been visited by other races. But the most advanced probably don't need space
ships.... and it seems that only as far back as WW II, the "top hat" UFO's were using aircraft aluminum and the more recent one's are glowing
(probably by using Plasma to streamline air flow). So likely, what we are seeing is Terrestrial -- but by no means would that rule out the presence of
more advanced alien contact.
The government would lie about it, of that I'm 100% sure.