Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by SLAYER69
While it is possible that the site could have been exposed 9,500 years ago it is not certain. But let's assume it was. Let's also assume there
actually was a city on the site and the inhabitants had to move as sea levels gradually rose. Why is there no other evidence of even village life
until 6,000 years later and 200 miles away? If a migration was forced by rising sea levels why would it take 6,000 years? Why would the gradual rise
in sea level (a global average of something like 1cm/year) have caused them to disappear completely?
k lets look at it that way if the world was flooded and everyone was killed and only a handful of humans survived it would take generations to regain
what was lost!
also if these cities are as old as they say can we then agree that mankind hasn't been alone and that we ARE apes genetically manipulated to speed up
our evolution!
see the thing with you one track minded people "evolitionists" and "creationists" i'm assuming you belong to one group or the other right?
well the universe created everything that exists within it! "CREATED" there for when life began it was only a matter of time before something
evolved into intelligence..."EVOLVED"
we all know that we are very similiar to apes so therefore our ancestors did indeed evolve from that particular earth life form BUT we also know that
something isnt right in our evolution thats why its still a THEORY but when we connect creationism with evolution we get the picture ahh yes!
the universe created everything our ancestors evolved to a point aliens created modern man through genetic manipulation! so everyone is right but only
1/3 right in what they believe one sidedly!
good day!