Slayer,
As you are finding, you waste your breath trying to communicate any idea to Parta.
I can't see what he's saying because I've had him on ignore for a year or so now.
However, I will chime in here to let everyone know that there is not likely to be any "9,000 year old city" on the floor of the Gulf of Khambat.
The date itself is from a piece of wood dredged up. How bogus is that?
After all, it
is a gulf, and it
is the recipient of the runoff of a huge portion of the Indian Subcontinent.
The wood might be 9,000 years old. The fact that it lay on the ocean floor in the area says nothing at all about any "structures" under the
water.
The "pottery" found there wasn't pottery at all.
Here's a
LINK that shows that the so-called "pottery" was simply sediment that had
been cemented together through the natural workings of tube worms of various kinds on the ocean floor.
Why anyone would be surprised to find really old stuff buried in the sediments on the floor of a major gulf that receives a huge amount of runoff from
a large portion of India is beyond me. Are we to imagine that nothing was ever washed into the river, and thus onto the Gulf floor, during the
Harappan Civilization or even before?
Those of you that think to date this by the "melting of glaciers" at the end of the last ice age should think again as well. The Indian
Subcontinent is part of the Indo-Australian plate, a tectonic plate which today is partially over an old subduction zone. Parts of India and the area
west of there - including Australia - have been bobbing up and down like a hooker on Saturday night - at least when their movement is considered in
the scale of geological time.
Heck, part of the plate is still submerged today after several million years. Indonesia represents the mountaintops of this continent that was dragged
underwater millions of years ago. Here's a pdf from Scientific American about it and about the process of subduction.
LINK2
Anyway, there's no reason to believe that the Gulf of Cambay (Khambhat) was flooded by icemelt. The same goes for Dwarka which was inundated only a
thousand years or so B.C.
Nothing says that there is any
truly "ancient" civilization from India . As far as we know, at least.
Harte
[edit on 8/31/2009 by Harte]