Ground Zero photos released by exiled FEMA agent Kurt Sonnenfeld- 675 MB, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 74 times


reply posted on 28-8-2009 @ 12:21 AM by thedman
reply to post by Jezus



No they used a lift - like in these pictures



Or iron worker stood on a beam




So how did you think they cut the beams?



reply posted on 28-8-2009 @ 12:36 AM by impressme
reply to post by thedman



By looking at the above photos that Spreston posted, we can clearly see that those photos must have been taken a day or two after the WTC came down because, there is too much smoke in the debris field and it doesn’t look like clean up operation have even stated yet furthmore, looking at your photos one can see there is no smoke in the debris field.
Besides, look at the firemen they are still fighting the WTC fires, they are not cleaning up the site.


reply posted on 28-8-2009 @ 12:10 PM by thedman
reply to post by impressme





By looking at the above photos that Spreston posted, we can clearly see that those photos must have been taken a day or two after the WTC came down because, there is too much smoke in the debris field and it doesn’t look like clean up operation have even stated yet furthmore, looking at your photos one can see there is no smoke in the debris field.


Pictures are from several months after

Check these photos from December 2001 - Notice FF dressed in similar style. FF on site had by this time wearing coveralls/turnout jackets/helmets instead of full turnout gear. Turnout or bunker gear
is very hot and restrictive, also pants were getting cut up by debris
requiring replacement - very expensive



Notice can see some "smoke" - most likely steam coming off. Debris pile
burned for 3 months after. Water had to be poured onto pile from Hudson River. Even after fires extinguished pile was still hot and steam coming
off. It was also December, week before Christmas, which in NYC is usually
cold and damp, day time temps around 40 F (4 C). Steam would condense
into visble cloud.


reply posted on 28-8-2009 @ 02:41 PM by impressme
reply to post by thedman



I have to disagree with you and all we are doing here is throwing out opinions and assumptions nothing more. YOU have not proven anything here but given your opinion.


reply posted on 28-8-2009 @ 04:53 PM by Donny 4 million
Originally posted by thedman
reply to
post by impressme





By looking at the above photos that Spreston posted, we can clearly see that those photos must have been taken a day or two after the WTC came down because, there is too much smoke in the debris field and it doesn’t look like clean up operation have even stated yet furthmore, looking at your photos one can see there is no smoke in the debris field.


Pictures are from several months after

Check these photos from December 2001 - Notice FF dressed in similar style. FF on site had by this time wearing coveralls/turnout jackets/helmets instead of full turnout gear. Turnout or bunker gear
is very hot and restrictive, also pants were getting cut up by debris
requiring replacement - very expensive



Notice can see some "smoke" - most likely steam coming off. Debris pile
burned for 3 months after. Water had to be poured onto pile from Hudson River. Even after fires extinguished pile was still hot and steam coming
off. It was also December, week before Christmas, which in NYC is usually
cold and damp, day time temps around 40 F (4 C). Steam would condense
into visble cloud.





I wish you could post these pictures in your link. Maybe SPreston could help you. Side by side you will definitely see how you have made the case for the pictures Preston posted and his statements.
Your photos from December show mounds and mounds of collected debris
They also show cut columns standing 25 feet above the debris . And that much has been moved or removed. Literally thousands of tons maybe hundreds of thousands. I would say Preston's are immediately after the demolition. 3-4 days tops
Yours next to SPrestons are really in contrast.
Also your photos show lots of activity. Preston's Fireman are just standing there in disbelief.



reply posted on 28-8-2009 @ 06:40 PM by Donny 4 million
reply to post by Soloist



They were in disbelief of the hot molten metal. Like you still are. This was a reply to your tag team member anyway. Is he off shift?


reply posted on 29-8-2009 @ 01:56 AM by Soloist
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
reply to
post by Soloist



They were in disbelief of the hot molten metal. Like you still are. This was a reply to your tag team member anyway. Is he off shift?


Uh-huh.

I noticed you skipped the first question. I shouldn't be surprised that you cannot back up your claim of the picture being taken "3-4 days tops" after the collapse.

Oh, did anyone figure out how in the heck that "super-secret-nano-thermite" cut beam stayed intact during the collapse of a 110 story building, especially if it were in a sub-basement level as SPreston claims?


reply posted on 29-8-2009 @ 10:56 AM by thedman
reply to post by Donny 4 million





Also your photos show lots of activity. Preston's Fireman are just standing there in disbelief.


Standing around in disbrief????

The FDNY members are NOT standing around in disbelief ! They are monitoring area for hazards and most grimly looking for human remains
uncovered by the machines moving the steel. Have many friends
who spent time, up to 3 weeks on the scene looking for body parts


reply posted on 29-8-2009 @ 12:14 PM by Donny 4 million
Originally posted by thedman
reply to
post by Donny 4 million





Also your photos show lots of activity. Preston's Fireman are just standing there in disbelief.


Standing around in disbrief????

The FDNY members are NOT standing around in disbelief ! They are monitoring area for hazards and most grimly looking for human remains
uncovered by the machines moving the steel. Have many friends
who spent time, up to 3 weeks on the scene looking for body parts



I see no one in Preston's photos working or with dogs or body bags.
I see no one peering into the debris at all.
Just standing around doing nothing but peering away in disbelief.
It was way before there was any organized anything IMO.
As far as where exactly the photo was taken lets have a REINVESTIGATION and find out.
You are certainly in favor of that ain't ya!


reply posted on 2-3-2011 @ 01:13 PM by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by Mike Philbin



I believe Kurt is fine. Which is weird, because one would assume that a conspiracy that could covertly mobilise hundreds of people to murder their compatriots without breathing a word, effortlessly silence the vast majority of architects and scientists, and kill with ease and impunity, would have little troublein getting rid of him.



reply posted on 2-3-2011 @ 01:58 PM by guessing
reply to post by solidshot



I agree . i see no reason why this beam should have been cut like this and further, when I first saw this photo my first thought was it looks like a 'pre cut'. not a 'clean up' cut....
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 8 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 19 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags