It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
What about all these riot cops?
Are they not Americans too?
The Constitution for the united States of America has been reduced to nothing more than toilet wipe by such law enforcers all over this union of states. “If the exercise of a constitutional right can become the cause for imprisonment, the constitution has been nullified and there is no security from omnipotent government; the constitution has become a worthless scrap of paper.” Marchetti v US, 390 US 39, 57 (1968).
If one man or woman has not damaged another man or woman or their property, there is no crime that can be committed. A “crime” must have a victim. Lacking a bona fide victim, the American is merely exercising his Rights.
A State – the government whether federal or of a state – has no rights to violate. It is a fiction established by flesh and blood people.
Title 18, Section 2331(5)(A) defines “domestic terrorism” as “activities that – involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;” AND (B)(i) that “appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population.”
The FBI defines terrorism as, “Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”
Furthermore, any time any act violates the principles of justice this union of states was founded on, due process has been violated thereby violating the Constitution and Natural Law –
“Due process is violated if a practice or rule offends some principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental.” Snyder v Massachusetts, 291 US 97, 105 (1934).
“…that which violates the spirit of the constitution is as much unconstitutional as one that violates its letter." Sinking Fund Cases, 99 US 700 dis op.
We must understand that an act by an American man or woman that is deemed a crime and defined as such must have a victim, plus there must be the intent to damage or harm. Lacking either, the act cannot be defined as a “crime” –
“Where the record is wholly void of any necessary element of a crime, the case is constitutionally infirm." Thompson v Louisville, 362 US 199.