White House appears ready to drop 'public option', page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 16-8-2009 @ 11:26 AM by warrenb
reply to post by MOFreemason



Funny they focus on one small part of the bill that they "believe" is the issue.

What about the part of the bill that allows them to enter your home or take your children away?

Yes there are multiple versions of the bill floating around. Why don't they pick one to focus on and make it all public?


reply posted on 16-8-2009 @ 12:44 PM by Xtinguish
www.bloomberg.com...


A provision in the plan that would provide end-of-life counseling to families, dubbed “death panels” by opponents, has also ignited opposition. Conrad said that provision has been dropped from consideration.


Thought that provision never existed. How can it be dropped if it never existed?

[edit on 16-8-2009 by Xtinguish]


reply posted on 16-8-2009 @ 12:49 PM by Eurisko2012
reply to post by MOFreemason



Thank you Sarah Palin!
By the end of August They should drop the whole bill in the fireplace
and start over.
The democrats are already running away from ObamaCare.
I guess calling the opponents "racists and un-american" was
clearly a mistake.



reply posted on 16-8-2009 @ 01:05 PM by mental modulator
Originally posted by warrenb
reply to
post by MOFreemason




What about the part of the bill that allows them to enter your home or take your children away?



Did you read what you posted???


Are you that paranoid or dense???

cause that belief is way out there - GIVE US A LINK


reply posted on 16-8-2009 @ 05:28 PM by Maxmars
I would like to believe that a small comment some had been passing around the community (theirs) gave a moment of pause....

"If this is such a great idea, Congress and all 'executive' public servants should be obliged to set the example and use it."

A little push like that can demonstrate exactly how 'real' their enthusiasm for the bill actually is.

Also, Health Care Bill conceptualization, branding, and marketing notwithstanding, it was becoming harder and harder to avoid the appearance that the reason there was no 'actual' final draft of the bill to debate was telling.

It meant that the 'real' bill wasn't going to surface until a few days before the vote. (i.e. their "standard practice")

Don't expect all the offensive provisions of some the bill's incarnations to have perished, they will surface again in a different guise under other initiatives, for example the WHO-driven initiatives which are part and parcel of the global governance agenda (the Codex Alimentarium comes to mind).

I must say that it seems evident the political clown college has been forced to sit up and take notice. That is a minor victory. They are apparently not all that comfortable with their 'insulation' from public sentiment - they want our 'love.'

The next batch of legislation should include more controls securing their 'entitlements, rights, and privileges' - particularly those they don't share with the rest of us 'human resources.'

Did someone say Obama has been working on this for two years? Is that a quote?

[edit on 16-8-2009 by Maxmars]



reply posted on 16-8-2009 @ 08:39 PM by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by Nivcharah





Don't be the least surprised if the new bill proposed is a 'copy & paste' of the current one . . . with a few alterations to make it APPEAR different.

I wouldn't be so sure of that. I think that the House members were brought down to ground level, and many of them are truly afraid that they will not be re-elected, if they go against the wishes of the voters.
I believe a very watered down bill will be passed, which in the long run, will do nothing. However, it will allow Obama to say that he was "successful" in passing health care reform.
Politicians are very skilled at doing nothing, and making it look like they have done something.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^