It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IMMORTAL
What I would like to know is why he did identify himself. I'm presuming that these Arab people know a few English words?--Maybe they said to him, "identify yourself" in English? But, I think they would want him to identify himself anyway so that the "message" could hit home.
In my opinion, this video depicting a decapitation is genuine, even though it may have some editing descrepancies. Also, I think that these guys had help from peopleLike an arm of the CIA in the middle east.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
PsyOps, yes, disgusting, yes.
But the family receiving their son's decapitated body should be able to identify his remains. Or is this done somehow differently?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
You know, I am not at all surprised at the content of this thread. I was thinking, those who continue to deny the evil intentions of Al Quida would subsequently deny the validity of this video.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
The shotty video taping could be questioned, but you also have to consider it being an amateur videographer
Originally posted by worldwatcher
john i have no idea how to explain your points, they are very intriguing to say the least, however is it possible that there were 2 separate tapes of the same incident sent out, and somehow edited together by the jihadist group that released the video on the internet?
This could be possible, but no one has claimed credit for the editing of this tape by the network as far as I'm aware. Because of this I am lead to go on what I've got, and will have to continue with my theory until this point of yours is proven as fact. That could well explain it though.
is it also possible that the time change could be caused by some dumb terrorist guy not knowing how to use his camera, removing a battery or cutting the power some how to equipment? just a thought, since my camera currently has the wrong date and time on it.
No that is not possible. I've already explained in my last post why it's not the case. The time starts at 13:00 hours, after a cut goes to 2:00 hours and then at the next goes to 13:00 hours again but further in time. It means that both are continuations of the same footage but on different tapes.
Originally posted by watcheroftheskies
if there is anyone on ATS i who has expert credentials in the field of film or videography i implore you to step forward and analyze this film for us....please....
Originally posted by John Nada
Ok, the video starts and we have a shot of Bert side on.
After this it cuts to a complete straight on shot of Bert,
and then we cut to the main portion of the footage with the terrorists behind Bert.
Then we cut to a close up of Bert on the floor
Now this lasts for a few moments as Bert struggles on the floor
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
His family put in a lawsuit againts some part of the goverment.
if you can find out more about this lawsuit cobra i would appreciate it .....this is very odd....
1) Why use language like qurentened?
can you find me some links or wording somewhere ....where the word quarintined is used.....first the government says they had him or he tells his parents this and then hes in the hands of al-qaeda....very odd....
2) what happened between the 9thand the 11th?