Originally posted by azzllin
Would like to point out to those who think the word of Einstein is gospel.

Even today when Scientists talk about the work of Einstein, most of his work is still referred to as THEORY, a THEORY is not a fact.

We, all of us are told that the laws of Physics are locked and can not be changed, Altered, or bypassed, yet who are the ones keeping us informed of these facts? do a little research on Scientists who have claimed major break through supposedly debunking these laws, and then see what happened to them after their claims, we are told they lost funding support and any other form of support because their claims where bogus, and they became classed as cooks, and then Science did all they could to distance itself from them, claiming they were wrong, but where they really?

Are we really that naive to believe every break through was just quasi Science, or where they stopped because we are not allowed to know?

Originally posted by jtma508
Not that I necessarily believe that this device actually worked but I want to throw a counter-argument out for the 'conservation of energy' parrots. That theory was based upon the universe as it was understood at the time. There have been oodles of descoveries since that have significantly changed our understanding of how the universe works and what comprises it.

We know that we are enveloped in a bath of cosmic energy that is over 1,000 eV/cubic meter. I'm not saying that it is necessarily the case, but it is possible that the interaction of magenetic fields in these devices could, somehow, capture some of this energy. The device is, then, no longer violating conservation of energy.

Keep in mind, most commonly in science, phenomena are discovered and tyhen AFTERWARDS science works to explain them. If the phenomenon can be verified as valid but violates 'known' rules, the rules are simply changed to accommodate the new discovery. Happens all the time.

Originally posted by habfan1968
At some point some one will invent a perpetual generator that requires almost no input without it long distance space travel will not be possible.

Originally posted by mellisamouse
All you do is reverse the polarity of the magnets so they repell each other......not rocket science.

Originally posted by mellisamouse
put one set around the part of the motor that runs one way, and the opposing on the other side, with your cooerwired inside the two opposing sides if the double wheel......


probly would be easier to understand if I could make a video.....I need a new webcam....mine got chewed by a rabbit, lol..


ps, just thought I would add, ceramic berrings and wheel, so the magnets wouldn't be attracting themseles to metal berrings or wheel...

[edit on 23-8-2009 by mellisamouse]

Originally posted by jsobecky
There will never be a free energy machine because it is impossible. It goes against the laws of physics.

l2

Originally posted by digimedia1742

My undestanding is that the energy created by the machine is greater than it's consumption, so it uses the battery power to initiate the movement, but provides more energy than the battery output, so it repowers the battery, and gives off whatever is left over (5 times the amount) in power.

am i wrong?

Oh definatly repowing the battery is an easy goal, adding a bridge rectifyer if you will make too much power to store......I think these could be incorporated to not NEED a battery for storing energy though.....they could just contintually run with an on off switch, (basically just change the angle of the magnets to switch off and stop them repelling each other, etc)

Originally posted by mellisamouse

Originally posted by digimedia1742

My undestanding is that the energy created by the machine is greater than it's consumption, so it uses the battery power to initiate the movement, but provides more energy than the battery output, so it repowers the battery, and gives off whatever is left over (5 times the amount) in power.

am i wrong?

Oh definatly repowing the battery is an easy goal, adding a bridge rectifyer if you will make too much power to store......I think these could be incorporated to not NEED a battery for storing energy though.....they could just contintually run with an on off switch, (basically just change the angle of the magnets to switch off and stop them repelling each other, etc)

i just got the description .. there are TWO batteries used in the system - one to store, one to to help the motor going.. it is really working scheme