It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Army Protecting Obama

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 15 2009 @ 12:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Moshpet
 


I suppose I see what you mean. When I was watching it, I kept thinking to myself; "Why don't they just shoot him?"

I had to take a step back and consider just how desensitized I am..

[edit on 8/15/2009 by nasdack24k]




posted on Aug, 15 2009 @ 12:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by detachedindividual

Originally posted by OldDragger


And, speaking of respecting the Democratic Process and concern for country... where is all the concern by Obama supporters over the closure of Guantanamo, the recall of troops from Iraq, the control of funds to the Banking elite, the ending of torture or prisoners...
All of those things (and there are a lot more) your new president swore he would do while campaigning. Has he done ANY of those things?

ENOUGH ALREADY with the blind support for your great President!
Admit it, nothing has changed, you're still screwed, your banking elite still own your ass, people are still held without charge, people are still transported for torture, troop numbers are increasing...

I loved the idea of Obama finally getting into office and undoing all the damage Bush did, starting with Guantanamo.
And guess what, I no longer believe a word he says.


This is exactly why I thought many people would start waking up to the 2-party scam and screaming foul.

I guess it is more of a cult of personality on both sides than the people actually caring about the issues.



posted on Aug, 15 2009 @ 08:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by detachedindividual
The poster raised a valid point about specialised vehicles (with a military appearance) being used on US soil. That is a fair question considering the recent concerns about the the Posse Comitatus Act.


So you say the 'military looking' aspect of the vehicle is a valid point? Even though the vehicle in use in the video is owned and operated by the FBI, who does not fall under the Posse Comitatus act? As far as I know, it's the actual organization not the appearance of their equipment that's important. Do you know that a lot of local law enforcement SWAT teams use 'military looking' equipment in their profession? Should that also fall under the Posse Comitatus act?



new topics
 
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join