It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tjack I'm sure I would be fully in the "it's man worked" camp.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by tjack I'm sure I would be fully in the "it's man worked" camp.
Well I am not 'fully' in the man made camp, but still waiting for the 'naturalists' to back up their claim and show me these similar formations they talk about... because I have looked for years and cannot find any...
And I know my rock
Everytime I present a notion, I am hounded to prove my case..
I contend that turn about is fair play
Show me similar natural occurrences that have such sharp 90 degree angles and such smooth surfaces on that scale and we can talk
(PS that is not directed at you personally )
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to post by Harte
If it was above water 2000 years ago, then the water currant could not of made the formation as many have explained. This rules out a lot of natural formation
the people could have used it as a quarry.
Originally posted by Harte
Nah. If you look at the island of Yonagunui itself, you'll see the same kinds of geomorphology - except for where the stone is covered by soil and forest.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
It's a natural formation IMO ...
...the structure has no symmetry or scale that represents a Temple or .. well.. anything. The "Stairs" for instance, are not stairs.... unless the person using them has a 20ft stride.
Originally posted by zorgon
Can you describe or provide evidence on the natural forces that would create such precision angles an flat surface on that scale? Would be appreciates. Thanks
Originally posted by Harte
You're thinking of it the wrong way. The stone in this formation was not eroded into these shapes, it broke into these shapes. (It's called cleavage - sounds more enticing now, doesn't it? LOL)
Originally posted by Harte As you know, there is natural horizontal cleavage in any sedimendary rock because of the way it is formed through, ahem, sedimentation. Sandstone - which is a form of limestone- is sedimentary.
Sandstone is a sedimentary rock composed mainly of sand-size mineral or rock grains. Most sandstone is composed of quartz and/or feldspar because these are the most common minerals in the Earth's crust. Like sand, sandstone may be any color, but the most common colors are tan, brown, yellow, red, gray and white. Since sandstone beds often form highly visible cliffs and other topographic features, certain colors of sandstone have been strongly identified with certain regions
Limestone is a sedimentary rock composed largely of the mineral calcite (calcium carbonate: CaCO3). The deposition of limestone strata is often a by-product and indicator of biological activity in the geologic record. Calcium (along with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) is a key mineral to plant nutrition: soils overlying limestone bedrock tend to be pre-fertilized with calcium. Limestone is an important stone for masonry and architecture, vying with only granite and sandstone to be the most commonly used architectural stone. Limestone is a key ingredient of quicklime, mortar, cement, and concrete. The solubility of limestone in water and weak acid solutions leads to important phenomena.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Not saying it's not a man made structure, just saying to me it looks natural.
Originally posted by zorgon
al I am asking is those that have the opinion that its natural to at least back up that claim with other examples... the fact that no one has indicates to me that they can't
Surely to have an opinion that it's natural, one has to understand HOW it can have been made naturally yes?
The Yonaguni Monument is composed predominantly of medium to very fine sandstones and mudstones of the lower Miocene Yaeyama group (the rocks themselves were derposited about 20 million years ago.)
These rocks contain numerous well-defined parallel bedding planes along which the layers easily separate. The rocks of this group are also criss-crossed by numerous sets of parallel and vertical (relative to the horizontal bedding planes of the rocks) joints and fractures. Yonaguni lies in an earthquake-prone region; such earthquakes tend to fracture rocks in a regular manner.
Please show me examples of other natural stone blocks that have cleaved into such perfect angles as you have repeatedly claimed... and not the basalt columns but limestone or sandstone blocks similar to what the 'monument' is made of.
Originally posted by Harte
I did back it up and you dismissed it without reason.
Let me ask you this, are you a geophysicist?
Schoch is. Here's what he found there:
Like I said, cleavage at right angles.