RUSSIAN EXPEDITION explores 80-100 feet high underwater manmade structure, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 04:59 PM by Harte
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to
post by sunspot0



Thank you for sharing the video. I am glad it is not translated so many of us can make our own conclusions. I agree it is natural, with some obvious quarry activity going on at the site. As one person has stated, this area was above water over 10,000 years ago and could have easily been used to quarry material needed for building.


Actually, there's a thread about this right here at ATS that clearly states the site sank sometime around 2,000 years ago. Seach it out. It was posted by Cormac MacAirt.

Of course, that means that it would certainly have been above water prior to that, for how long we don't know.

But the Appalacian mountains have been above sea level for millions and millions of years. Go look there for signs of "ancients." Yyou won't find ny there either.

In fact, I have a rock in my pocket that has been around longer than the Appalacians, maybe it's got a spark plug inside of it.

Harte


reply posted on 24-8-2009 @ 10:12 PM by ls1cameric
reply to post by Harte



Sorry bro but I'm not buying it... Theres way too many "coincidences" here for me to believe this is a natural formation...

Although I have the feeling that regardless of wahts found, you'll still deny it.




[edit on 24-8-2009 by ls1cameric]



reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 03:39 AM by zorgon
I hate Youtube Well most of the time







Images courtesy of the Morien Institute
www.morien-institute.org...






Perhaps they were called away before they could finish it?

Yonaguni Photo Gallery
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

COMPARISON

Huge steps to big for humans... that also go nowhere





Terraces and steps: prehistoric rock-hewn structures at Sacsayhuaman and nearby Qenko in the high Andes mountains of Peru

Now explain to me the purpose of the above two examples and leave your hexagonal basalt columns out of this... its getting old and 'weathered' down...

Besides my rocks are better






[edit on 25-8-2009 by zorgon]


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 03:43 PM by kidflash2008
reply to post by Harte



If it was above water 2000 years ago, then the water currant could not of made the formation as many have explained. This rules out a lot of natural formation as the people could have used it as a quarry.


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 04:06 PM by Harte
Originally posted by ls1cameric
reply to
post by Harte



Sorry bro but I'm not buying it... Theres way too many "coincidences" here for me to believe this is a natural formation...

Although I have the feeling that regardless of wahts found, you'll still deny it.


Well, since you've made up your mind without even considering any evidence, I won't bother to try to enlighten you.

Have a nice ignorance.

Harte


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 04:23 PM by Kandinsky
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13

The Dropa Stones were fictional and acknowledged as such by the guy that wrote about them. Google David Agamon and Von Daniken. Not one person in the account ever existed and half the Chinese names were made up. The hand of Daniken strikes again!


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 04:24 PM by buddhasystem
reply to post by zorgon



Term "erosion" also applies to cracking of the material along the fault lines. Just thought I'd point it out.

I've seen very large rocks of cubical shape. I do not think these were man-made.


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 04:28 PM by Skyfloating
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to
post by Ophiuchus 13

The Dropa Stones were fictional and acknowledged as such by the guy that wrote about them. Google David Agamon and Von Daniken. Not one person in the account ever existed and half the Chinese names were made up. The hand of Daniken strikes again!


The stones themselves are not fictional. Thousands of ancient discs have been found at burial sites. This is common knowledge. The term "Dropa" is what was a misnomer, because they were found all over China and not just with the "Dropka" dwarves of Tibet.

[edit on 25-8-2009 by Skyfloating]


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 04:42 PM by Kandinsky
reply to post by Skyfloating


I'd have to check Sky, I think it's open to discussion about those stones I'll have another look, it's been a long time...


reply posted on 25-8-2009 @ 04:44 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by aorAki
How's your geological knowledge?


pretty good And yours?


I guess more work needs to be done to see if there are any tool marks, any out of place items, check the talus slope for evidence etc.


Göbekli Tepe, Turkey

Built before we had invented pottery

Q: How do they know Gobekli Tepe is so old?

A: The archaeological team at Gobekli, working under Klaus Schmidt, has used radiocarbon analysis on the soils adhering to the stones. The analysis shows that the main stones at Gobekli Tepe were erected between 10,000 and 9,000 BC. The characteristics of flint arrowheads found here confirm these dates.

Q: How could hunter-gatherers build something so complex?

A: Farming did not start in this area until 8,000BC. It is therefore certain that hunter-gatherers did build Gobekli: there was no one else around. Klaus Schmidt (right) speculates that large bands of hunters congregated here during the construction. (Bones and arrowheads support this thesis.) They then dispersed, perhaps returning to Gobekli at specified times of the year.
pic

Q: Why was the site buried in 8,000 BC?

A: No one knows. But the way the dust is packed around the stones shows that Gobekli was entombed deliberately, and with some care.


Hunter gathers did carvings like this?... With what tools?



her is the site, uncovered and still buried graphic



Of course many archaeologists will tell you that it was built for 'religious purposes' though nothing at all was found at the site... no pottery, no tools, no signs of human habitation... nothing but some bones and arrowheads that could have been dropped by later users ( I cannot find any study that has dates the bones to the same time period)

Point is there are many secrets still buried

www.thelivingmoon.com...


Certainly though, volcanic outcrops can appear 'unnatural' to those predisposed to excitement!


Yes the flogged to death hexagonal cleavages of a specific form of basalt that RARELY forms the hexagonal columns (Giant's Causeway, Devil's postpile, a few others) that skeptics ALWAYS use to make a point yet never ONCE have they offered proof of WHAT KING OF STONE is on site... is it basalt? Is it granite? Is it softer sedimentary rock?

Granite does cleave into angular blocks... like these cliffs

BIG PICTURE

But as you see wind and water round off the edges in a few short years. The reason is granite consists of quartz (hard) feldspar (soft) and Biotite Mica (flaky) so it erodes quickly and unevenly

You made the comment "How's your geological knowledge?" implying YOU have some..

Well show me a sample of granite blocks in nature that are as smooth and as square and so close together and we can talk about 'natural' Its easy to say nature makes some interesting shapes... but you can't use basalt columns to compare to granite blocks and expect your 'geological knowledge' to have any credibility, nor give you the ability to make an informed opinion if you don't even know the rock type of the site, or the processes that effect that rock


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 9 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 17 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 6 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 18 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 13 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Political Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 55 flags
My opinion about this site's purpose
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 45 flags
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 29 flags
I'm sick of all the KOOKS!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
New Topic Fire-hose censoring
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 12 flags