This was a matter of time. I work with this people everyday and despite the fact I agree progress is too slow advances are being made.
A screen for cancer killers:
A new approach for identifying drugs that specifically attack cancer stem cells, the cellular culprits that are thought to start and maintain tumour
growth, could change the way that drug companies and scientists search for therapies in the war against cancer.
"We now have a systematic method that had not been previously known that allows us to find agents that target cancer stem cells," says Piyush Gupta
of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and first author of the study, published online
today in Cell1.
Applying the technique, Gupta and his colleagues discovered one of the first compounds that can selectively destroy cancer stem cells. The drug, an
antibiotic commonly fed to pigs and chickens, reduces the proportion of breast cancer stem cells by more than 100-fold compared with a drug widely
used in chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Although most cancer therapies wipe out the vast majority of tumour cells, they have not been able to eliminate the cause of the disease — the
cancer stem cells — so the cancer often comes roaring back with a vengeance. Researchers have looked for drugs that preferentially target cancer
stem cells, but these repeat-offender cells are so rare that screening for potential compounds has been nearly impossible. The study team, led by
Robert Weinberg and Eric Lander, also from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, exploited a trick, boosting the number of cancer-stem-cell-like
cells to find a molecular missile that homes in on the real target.
By silencing a specific gene in breast cancer cells, the researchers coaxed them to convert from epithelial cells, which make up most of the human
body, into mesenchymal cells, which have many stem-cell-like characteristics. They then used these cells — which have the same molecular signatures
as cancer stem cells and are equally drug resistant — to screen around 16,000 chemicals. They found 32 contenders, then whittled the list down to
one drug: salinomycin, an antibiotic often found in animal feed.
With a candidate compound in hand, the researchers tested it against the target: stem cells in breast cancer cell lines. In comparisons between
salinomycin and paclitaxel, a drug used to treat women with advanced breast cancer, salinomycin repeatedly reduced the proportion of cancer stem cells
whereas paclitaxel, also known as Taxol, had the opposite effect. "It's definitely a step forwards," says cancer biologist John Dick of the
University of Toronto in Canada, who was not involved in the research.
It's not yet exactly clear how salinomycin
eradicates cancer stem cells or whether the compound will find its way into the
clinic, says Gupta. His team is using the drug to disrupt various stages of tumour formation and conducting larger scale chemical screens to uncover
other cancer-stem-cell-specific candidates.
Michael Lewis, a breast cancer researcher at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, says that the paper will force drug companies to reconsider
how they screen for agents that block tumour-initiating capacity. "If I was a big pharma company and I had 30,000 compounds on the shelf, I'd screen
them all" with this technique, he says. The study's only limitation, he notes, is that the researchers measured the effect of their drug on cancer
cell lines rather than on material taken from actual tumours.
The article where this discovery was published has just become available. I'll try to get it as soon as possible.