Britain’s army chief says Afghan mission could take 40 years, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 14-8-2009 @ 10:22 AM by KSPigpen
The former commander of NATO’s quick reaction force, who is now poised to step into the role as Britain’s army chief, says his country’s troops should be prepared to be engaged in Afghanistan for decades to come.


WTF?!?!

Article in Stars and Stripes

But while the British army’s role will evolve, “the whole process might take as long as 30 to 40 years,” Richards said during an interview published Saturday.

Richards added that there was “absolutely no chance” of NATO pulling out completely, telling The Times that Britain would continue to do its part in the nation-building effort.

The general’s comments have caused consternation among some British political leaders, who are saying such a commitment is unsustainable.

However in January, Gen. John Craddock, supreme allied commander Europe at the time, offered a rough projection, which resembles Richards’ views.

Craddock, who retired last month, told reporters that he expected U.S. troops to be engaged in Afghanistan for at least a decade, if not longer.

“Maybe not at current force levels, but I think we’ll see a presence there for decades,” Craddock said.


This is such B.S.

So, we can look forward to sending our men and women to DIE in Afghanistan for another few DECADES?!?!

Something has got to give. Surely they aren't this stupid are they? They know we can't 'win' over there, right?
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags
Pair Detained in Twitter Homeland Threat Mix-Up
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags