Another small but significant piece of evidence, the B.B.C. report regarding WTC7 collapsing several minutes prematurely and cast aside as `They`re
only human, it was an easy mistake to make, happens all the time`, Jane Standley carried on reading an incorrect report for just over 7 minutes, how
can anyone not notice the tower standing behind her over this time?, how horribly wrong it would have been for them if the tower would have collapsed
during her report.
Let`s look at the very simple process of a live news feed of which there are basically two ways of doing them.... On the spot ad libbing - making it
up as you go along and explaining the event the best you can, whilst throwing in the general consensus of the local people etc - would be absolutely
impossible to make such a gigantic mistake like that. The second way is via front line reports sent to a base station and relayed by an anchor...
So the link dies just 5 minutes before the event and we get the obligatory buck stops here feeble investigation, somewhere along a very short line the
B.B.C. - N.Y. live broadcast crew were sent a bulletin by either their own front line team or another news company, if it were another news company
then the B.B.C. would not have been the only newscasters broadcasting this story, an American company or a random country that had sent the data would
definitely have broadcasted the same mistake simultaneously.
So that leaves the only other option, okay everyone had to stand three blocks away, the building was showing signs of collapse so that is
understandable, a whole lot of commotion going on, panic, noise, it would be so easy to follow on after hearing someone say `WTC 7 has just collapsed`
and relay the data back to base, easy to do, hold on, this is B.B.C.`s own on the spot crew there, they are news journalists through and through,
where are their relative pictures and videos?, depicting the dust clouds and noise of collapse, and more importantly why was there no live from the
scene anchors put on air?.
So we now have and justly so, a huge anomaly and it warrants an investigation on whom relayed the bulletin to the base crew, must be a name/names
responsible for this, or shall we brush it aside and treat it like the average double entendre based goof that is the norm of news broadcasts goofs,
whilst deliberately ignoring the fact of a horrendously incorrect live news feed that had lasted 7 plus minutes until the obligatory link loss, then
boom 5 minutes after WTC7 done it`s thing.
Once again 9/11 brakes a record, google world news broadcasts although completely wrong are still aired for 7 minutes, I could not find one anywhere
near the calibre of this one, `happens all the time they say, nothing to see here, it was a common mistake`, got news for you all.. No it is not.
[edit on 11/08/2009 by Seventh]