It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Then Truth about Obama-care

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 04:51 PM
link   
commonsense2020.com...


Section 122
Page 29: Your Health Care is RATIONED.

Section 123
Page 30: A Government Committee will decide what treatments/benefits you get … depending on a predetermined set of factors.

Section 142
Page 42: The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your Health Care Benefits for you. You will have no choice in the matter.

Section 152
Page 50: Health Care will be provided to ALL non US citizens, illegal or otherwise. (The Heller amendment would have allowed health agencies to conduct simple database checks to verify citizenship.)


CommonSence2020


What the bill says, pages 167-168, section 401, TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE:
‘‘(a) TAX IMPOSED.—In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of—

(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over

(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer. . . .”

EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGE:

1. This section amends the Internal Revenue Code.

2. Anyone caught without acceptable coverage and not in the government plan will pay a special tax.

3. The IRS will be a major enforcement mechanism for the plan.


Commonsence2020


commonsense2020.com...

Here is the real truth of Obama-care.

Read it and be disgusted with me.








[edit on 8/13/2009 by mrmonsoon]




posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 04:55 PM
link   
The IRS part sounds like they will garnish from your paycheck if you don't have insurance.

I just can't see where they are going to get the money to pay for everything. The cost savings they project is based speculation IMO.



posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 05:16 PM
link   
reply to post by jam321
 


Remember them saying if you don't have healthcare, they will be fining you something like $1000...........

Chances are that if people can't afford healthcare, they don't have an extra grand just laying around either, so they will use IRS to get the money.



posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 05:30 PM
link   
I'm going to be a smart American. I'm going to not rely on a blog for my information on something, I'm going to go straight to the source which is so readily available right where it is supposed to be on the thomas.loc.gov website. (Link to entire document will be at the bottom of this post for you to really read it too!!)


Sect. 122


(a) In General- In this division, the term `essential benefits package' means health benefits coverage, consistent with standards adopted under section 124 to ensure the provision of quality health care and financial security, that--

(3) does not impose any annual or lifetime limit on the coverage of covered health care items and services;


Your blog:

Page 29: Your Health Care is RATIONED.


Sect 123


(b) Duties-

(1) RECOMMENDATIONS ON BENEFIT STANDARDS- The Health Benefits Advisory Committee shall recommend to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this subtitle referred to as the `Secretary') benefit standards (as defined in paragraph (4)), and periodic updates to such standards. In developing such recommendations, the Committee shall take into account innovation in health care and consider how such standards could reduce health disparities.


Your blog:

Section 123
Page 30: A Government Committee will decide what treatments/benefits you get … depending on a predetermined set of factors.


Well, yeah. Governments run amok is what I thought we all hope to avoid?

And that's only the first two. This health plan crap has turned the country into a cacophony of maddening howls and screeches as misinformed source after misinformed source purposely (on both sides) exaggerates issues to cause both sides to continue their shrill outrage.

When a blog is misinforming you it is time to ask whether or not you should be angry with the blog, or angry with yourself for believing a third party instead of going to the source that is so readily available and reading it yourself.

--

EDIT:
I forgot the link


linky


[edit on 8/13/09 by niteboy82]




top topics
 
2

log in

join