It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
They have no real movement ALONG their axis of rotation.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
Keep in mind that the vortices we are talking about are strong enough to induce roll in a following airplane if it gets to close to them. They can even impact the structural integrity of a following aircraft, depending on the exact aircraft and circumstances.
These vortices are not insignificant and are related to the weight of the aircraft that creates them. Stronger vortices being produced by heavier aircraft.
I still think that people who bring this issue up are not merely blowing smoke as some would have us believe.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Well...did you not read the other parts of my post?
Edit: If you take the point between figures 1 and 2 as the point when the plane entered the building, wouldn't it be reasonable to expect to then see two vortices of smoke curling down the face of the building to the bottom after impact?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I see exactly what you're alleging here, but the point is in those NASA photos ( a model in, BTW...calm air ) the smoke is there BEFORE the model "flies" through it!
What many of us are trying to say is that, irrespective of any disturbances in the air that existed from the airplane's passage, just milliseconds later the forces of the explosion and resulting expanding gasses would have overwhelmed the vortices.
Try an actual real-world every day comparison: An extremely gusty and windy day. Wingtip vortices will try to form, but the air will be too turbulent for cohesion. Vortices need calmer air to be stable, and to persist.
And, since I'm editing anyway, notice in the NASA photos the smoke really doesn't move 'forward' with the model's motion. Neither does the air.
The air DOES displace downwards slightly, but it is minimal, as seen.
In the government's version of the event there is no explosion per se.
All the damage is done by the impact of the plane. Fuel ignites also and there is a fireball, but no explosion.
In the NASA photos shown on page two of the thread there is a length of time before the secondary vortices form and start to descend. I know it is a very short time ...
Below the impact zone, there is little evidence of turbulence and that is the problem.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
The fireball, and the smoke accompanying it, was very energetic
--- that is why I used the gusty, windy, turbulent day as an example, NOT to suggest the conditions in NYC were such. It was the localized effects of the fireball, and the thermal heating forces, that would prevent the vortices from remaining coherent long enough to be sen in the smoke.
(ipsedixit quoted by weedwhacker)
Below the impact zone, there is little evidence of turbulence and that is the problem.
Not really, whilst true that heat rises, ALL of the air in the immediate vicinity was disrupted, and unstabilized, even down below within several meters. One would think.....
The expanding fireball had to PUSH air ahead of it, so we don't see the invisible air "wave front". I'd think it would create quite a breeze.....
After USAir Flight 427 (a Boeing 737) plunged from the sky near Pittsburgh on September 8, 1994, killing 127 passengers and 5 crew members, the NTSB frantically accelerated its efforts to determine what might have triggered the 6,000-ft nose dive. A bump (a sudden airspeed increase detected by the plane’s flight-data recorder) indicated that the 737 had encountered wake turbulence created by a Delta 727 that preceded Flight 427 into the Pittsburgh International Airport. Flight 427 trailed the 727 by 4.1 nmi, well within the FAA regulation that requires two planes of such weights to maintain a separation of 3 nmi. As part of the investigation to determine the potential impact of such an encounter, the NTSB requested that Langley conduct flights of its specially instrumented OV-10 and 737 research aircraft trailing an FAA 727 generating aircraft. Following the longest aviation accident investigation in safety board history (4 years), the results of this cooperative activity helped investigators conclude that the vortex encounter might have been the initiating mechanism resulting in a hardover failure of the rudder actuator, which was determined to be the primary cause of the accident.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I really doubt your assertion that there were explosives perfectly positioned and perfectly timed to explode exactly where the suicide pilots were going to hit the buildings, too many variables for that.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I really doubt your assertion that there were explosives perfectly positioned and perfectly timed to explode exactly where the suicide pilots were going to hit the buildings, too many variables for that.
I think he may be referring to the "flash" just as the noses of both planes touched the buildings.
My hypothesis on this is that there may have been some sort of explosives in the noses of the planes to help open up the buildings and to ensure the full entrance of the planes into the buildings.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
My hypothesis ... may have been some sort of explosives in the noses of the planes ...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
My impression has been that certain videos have been --- *ahem* --- "enhanced" with the 'flashes', since they don't seem to appear on all versions.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
AS FAR AS what's onboard, in the nose? That's where the Radar antenna is mounted.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
The airplanes were real, they were normal.