posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 12:51 AM
I think this is important. I believe the reactions that Howard Stern and crew were having that day, would reflect the reactions most people would be
having throughout the country. Many have asked why would there be need of such an attack? Just judge for yourselves the reactions that people were
having. They all wanted *WAR.* Notice this. It is a very natural reaction. In history, nations and rulers would get people to fight in this way or by
demonizing the enemy like Bush Sr. did in the first Gulf War.(regarding the torturing of babies)
Notice something else. The event in question was compared to Pearl Harbour. Does this sound familar?
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing
event––like a new Pearl Harbor"
Interestingly during the Howard Stern show questions start being asked. "How could all these planes evade our defenses." Questions on the Pentagon
strike. How could it be?
We know that the Afghanistan invasion was planned in advance of 9/11. The war was on the table.
Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go
ahead by the middle of October.
In many respects, the directive, as described to NBC News, outlined essentially the same war plan that the White House, the CIA and the Pentagon put
into action after the Sept. 11 attacks. The administration most likely was able to respond so quickly to the attacks because it simply had to pull the
plans “off the shelf,” Miklaszewski said.
It is important to recall the psychological factor that 9/11 had. It basically made everyone angry, so angry that they *Wanted War.* What is
interesting, is that this event which really was the "NEW PEARL HARBOUR" was only used to sell a war that was already on the shelf!