Originally posted by spacevisitor
Pathos, I really wonder the following.
Why you on one hand posted all these remarks and those others in this thread in order to point everyone over and over again to the in your eyes lack
of any solid evidence at all of what Col. Corso has said in that video while you self on the other hand started threads like these.
Dream Interpretation: Has Anyone Had This Dream Before?
reply to post by Pathos
First Documented UFO Debunked
reply to post by Pathos
My comment is not towards you personally, but more towards your sayings in general. I do not mean any disrespect.
Sure.
(1)
Dream Interpretation: Has Anyone Had This Dream Before?
Is a philosophical examination of personal exploration, which does not need facts to support any type of claim. Since I am not trying to prove
anything to be real, I don't need facts to examine a philosophical issue. Dreams are a subjective experience, which can have many interpretations.
(2)
First Documented UFO Debunked
When I opened this particular thread, I did present evidence that could be examined and measured. I gave everyone an aviation historical outline, and
I also presented their counter parts found in UFO theology. I provided the picture of the sketch Kenneth drew, gave a link to the German Horton,
presented dates, and also gave you three US military planes that can be looked up. I gave you stuff to examine.
Whats the difference between me and Mr. Corso's? I gave you stuff you can reference in a library, online, or in a military archive. Mr. Corso
presented his audience with a story, which cannot be 100% verified by the public. You cannot go to a library or a viable source to research his
claims. According to Mr. Corso's claims, no one kept record of what was going on in the 50s. So, how can he prove his case without evidence? You
can't.
That's the difference.
------ EDIT
When I added that last line to my post, within this thread, I did so out of respect for Mr. Knapp.
[edit on 14-8-2009 by Pathos]