George Knapp Interviews UFO Whistle-Blower Colonel Philip Corso (ATS Exclusive), page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 117 times


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 09:14 AM by antar
reply to post by Springer



Ah the voice of reason, I was beginning to think that too few had actually watched these incredible pieces shared with us as a gift.

I am really pleased to hear that George Knapp has become one our elite members, I look forward to much more from him in the future as I cant get enough of his personality, intelligence and style.


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 09:49 AM by tyranny22
reply to post by Pathos



In your world of "More is better" the Dolphin or Whales would reign supreme in this Universe because their brains have far superior functions than a lot of our modern oceanic technology. Or perhaps the mockingbird would be waging war for oil since it's brain mass is the largest, per ratio.

Just because a species would have less lobes doesn't mean it's intellectual function is any less.



reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 10:23 AM by BO XIAN
reply to post by StevesResearch



Excellent example about grandfatherly narratives.

I think it's more than unfair.

I think it's an irrational addiction to a TYPE II ERROR.

So called "super rationalists" seem compulsively driven to prance about in language that's designed to sound quite erudite and scientific and above all . . . super skeptical . . .

as though such were fool proof routes to knowledge.

They seem to fail utterly to realize that

a wholesale egregious and outrageous

BIAS in behalf of a TYPE II ERROR is

JUST AS HAZARDOUS, EVEN DEADLY

as a bias in behalf of a TYPE I ERROR.

Believing NOTHING is there when SOMETHING REALLY IS THERE

can be just as deadly as

believing SOMETHING is there when NOTHING really is.

Actually, a TYPE II ERROR BIAS CAN BE MORE DEADLY.

Believing NOTHING is there when AN ANGRY BEAR IS REALLY THERE

can leave one very BARE BONES'd.


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 10:34 AM by DaMod
Originally posted by tyranny22
What gets me is that people have no problem accepting this gentleman's word on working under and with Eisenhower or being Secretary General. They don't question whether or not he was put in charge (by President Eisenhower) of training and arming foreign troops. All that is perfectly acceptable.

BUT, when he starts talking about extraterrestrial autopsies ... well, obviously the man must be crazy. And in fact, the person even referencing the video must be a wack-o as well.

What makes this subject so un-acceptable for MOST people??? Is it that it makes them feel inferior as a species? Maybe it completely undermines their religion? I'm not sure. But, what I am sure of is that their has to be other intelligent beings in this Universe (simply from a mathematical standpoint). And it makes perfect sense to me that they haven't made contact with our primitive thinking, emotion filled species.

I dunno. Maybe the government is in the right about not releasing any information or acknowledging an extraterrestrial present. The majority of our species' mind's are still too feeble to accept the information.

It's sad really. It just shows me that human kind has a lot more evolving to do before we really start to understand our lives and this Universe we all exist in.

[edit on 13-8-2009 by tyranny22]


I know why, even though I agree with you. People can accept that Aliens exist out there in the vastness of the universe. People can accept that they might have interstellar capabilities. People can not accept that they have come to earth. For some reason our little blue ball is off limits to aliens in the minds of many. I've seen many skeptical and regular average joes say they could believe there is other life out there, but it never visited earth. I'm sure it's with good reason. Think about how hard that would be for some people, how scared it would make them. Most of them instantly would jump to the conclusion of invasion. I guess disregarding everything having to do with aliens visiting earth is more of a defense mechanism than anything.


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 11:24 AM by tallcool1
Originally posted by DaMod
I know why, even though I agree with you. People can accept that Aliens exist out there in the vastness of the universe. People can accept that they might have interstellar capabilities. People can not accept that they have come to earth. For some reason our little blue ball is off limits to aliens in the minds of many. I've seen many skeptical and regular average joes say they could believe there is other life out there, but it never visited earth. I'm sure it's with good reason. Think about how hard that would be for some people, how scared it would make them. Most of them instantly would jump to the conclusion of invasion. I guess disregarding everything having to do with aliens visiting earth is more of a defense mechanism than anything.


Actually, some of us can accept that there MAY be life "out there". I really doubt that if there is life out there that it has "interstellar capabilities". But in the science fiction belief that there are aliens with such a capability to travel the infinity of space - why are some of you so arrogant to insist that they MUST be visiting "our little blue ball"? That would equate to me, an "intelligent" Earth life form, travelling from my home in Washington state to - let's say Australia, just to look at an amoeba farm. Why would I travel all that distance to see something so mundane?

You people attack our logical thinking with ridiculous insults such as ""how scared it would make them". I have absolutely no fear of the unknown or death or being wrong about something. If there are aliens visiting Earth, why don't they just land publicly? They are superior to us after all so we pose no real threat to them. Are they simply obeying the governments of Earth? That is like you sitting because your dog told you to sit. There must be some teenage aliens that don't bend to authority so they fly around Earth with their "high beams" on just so we will notice them. And then they "tag" our wheat and corn fields with their graffiti simply to defy the authority.

If the clumsy "superior" aliens actually did land publicly, I would have no choice but to accept that they are here. I would not jump to the conclusion that they are here for an "invasion".It is not a "defense mechanism", it is simply logical questions and doubts that you have no logical answer for so you answer back in your blind faith with insults and condescending comments. Wow, that really encourages me to change my mind on this subject.


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 12:04 PM by tyranny22
reply to post by tallcool1



As for why they would want to visit our planet:
If you were traveling through the Sahara, would you not stop at an Oasis? Maybe you wouldn't stop at EVERY Oasis, but certainly, you'd have to stop an ONE eventually.

As for why they wouldn't just land and say "Here we are":
Because our society is set up around mythological "truths" we hold as pillars to our society. Just their presence on this planet would undermined nearly ALL religions. It WOULD cause mass chaos across the ENTIRE PLANET.

We are an extremely primitive species that only recognizes some 10,000 years of it's history. Anyone traveling the Universe would have at least that amount (and probably 10 times that) of time of technological advancement on what we currently have. Meaning, more than likely they've put aside any differences they had with their species in an effort to further advance with evolution.

We still kill each other for natural resources, greed and belief in whatever "God" we worship. Our species is not ready to accept that we are not the "End all, be all" of the Universe ... and if I were observing an alien species I certainly wouldn't want to be the cause of it's demise by showing up and saying, "Hey, we're here. Everything you've ever been taught to believe in is based on a lie. OK, well I got places to go, so see you later ... in another couple hundred thousand years."

It's my belief that we'll have to begin exploring beyond our own solar system before any extraterrestrial species makes it's presence known. At least, any responsible species would do so.

[edit on 13-8-2009 by tyranny22]


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 12:05 PM by spacevisitor
Thanks George Knapp and ATS for sharing this really marvelous interview.

As far as I see it was Colonel Philip Corso a very sincere and trustworthy man, and was therefore a very important and valuable whistleblower.
I really enjoyed this interview and listened as far as possible very careful to all the things Colonel Corso said.
Besides all those very interesting things of which I already was aware of some, I found these extra interesting to mention.
First this marvelous but o so true saying of him.

The more the debunkers screamed, the more better we liked it”.

Right.

Then his remarks about the “low gravity” area’s and the one particular case that has happened to one of the recovered missiles back then.

• That all the holes where like the screws where taken out. Where did I did see something like that happening for the first time? It was in the film close encounters of the third kind, quite amazing isn’t it?

• The engine look like it was taken apart by hand.

• What happened in a base in Russia, where the UFO’s come over the airdrome and the next day they found out that the tower was felt apart because all the rivets where fall out of the holes.

Then his encounter with a being of which he make a drawing and the part of his communication he had with it.
That when he said at a certain moment to the being “what do you offer” and the being said “a new world if you can take it”.

Then his remarks about the Sumerian civilization and the name for the beings they had obvious where in contact with then, the Igigis.
Here is what Jim Marss said in a also very interesting interview on project Camelot.

Just as a “for instance”: I truly believe that one of the main reasons for our precipitous invasion of Iraq was to make a beeline for Baghdad, and use a mob scene as a cover, for a very concerted effort to loot the Iraqi National Museum. What were they after? They were after newly discovered artifacts, tablets, scrolls and such that were being found in the ancient Sumerian cities of Uruk and some of these other places by French and German archaeological teams -- interestingly enough, the two countries who were most opposed to our entry into Iraq.

And what was taken? Very possibly knowledge of ancient energy manipulation technology. And this gets into anti-gravity and a bunch of weird and exotic technologies that conventional science would laugh at. But then, when you really study the issue, you find that these technologies have been worked on since at least World War II and have been kept under very ultra-secret classification programs ever since, because this is our leading edge technology.

So, you can see how it all ties together; Ancient history, UFOs, secret societies, the world government. It’s all part of the same big ball of wax, and unless you back off and take that broad overview and study a wide variety of topics, you’re never going to figure out what’s going on.


www.projectcamelot.net...

Then his remarks about the amazingly precise laser like cutting instruments that are used during cattle mutilations.

So, to keep it short, a really marvelous interview indeed.




[edit on 13/8/09 by spacevisitor]


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 12:06 PM by tallcool1
reply to post by Curio



OK, so suppose we follow your analogy. Why would they be hiding from us? Do we hide when we are studying a new form of life? Why would we care if the new Amazonian Purple Spotted Frog we just discovered and are studying knows we are there looking at it?


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 12:07 PM by muzzleflash
Thank You SO, Springer, and Mr Knapp!!!!

This is PREMIUM content and a major scoop!!

Through my many years of researching the topic and reading many books on the subject, including Corso's excellent writings, I am still largely undecided but have come to several sub-conclusions on various aspects.

#1) I have never seen a successful debunking of Corso, everything people say is usually opinion not fact.

#2) His mentioning about how they would find technology a day after it had "disappeared", or in one instance in Russia, the day after UFOs flew over the site; and the technology was taken apart "by hand" it appeared, as if the Aliens were actually studying our creations by disassembling them.

This is very interesting information and it goes perfectly with many of the other pieces of the puzzle, further inferring that we are being studied in a direct scientific manner.

#3) There is a distinct possibility that Corso could be half truth/ half disinfo. The prospect that he could have been subjugated to MK ULTRA style mind control/manipulation is a possibility we cannot discount.


#4) My overall assessment is that Corso is one of the more credible sources we have for information, his credentials are impeccable, and his knowledge is vast.

#5) He for sure knows way more than he is revealing. I have a feeling he is only giving us scraps, IE : He is giving us about 10% of the information available to him.

#6) Overall, Ladies and Gentlemen, I believe that Phil Corso is the real deal. This man gave us a legitimate lead.

Again , thank you ATS + Knapp for releasing this video as it is premium content and I hereby award you guys with four thumbs up!




reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 12:12 PM by tyranny22
reply to post by tallcool1



See my reply above.

The Amazonian Purple Spotted Frog hasn't built an entire society based upon mythical figures. And I assume (though I've never encountered a Amazonian Purple Spotted Frog) that this amphibian doesn't kill other Amazonian Purple Spotted Frog's out of greed or religious belief.

[edit on 13-8-2009 by tyranny22]


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 12:14 PM by tallcool1
reply to post by tyranny22



So then why won't they interfere and save us from ourselves. Even us as an immature uncivilized species will try to keep endangered species on Earth from becoming extinct. Usually we are unsuccessful, but at least we try. Why won't they? Are they just waiting for us to destroy ourselves so they can have this little "oasis" to themselves?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^