Video removed?
Already? Why?
3rd line for fun.
Edited coz I put a £ instead of a 3. soppy nadger I am
[edit on 13/8/09 by DataWraith]
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by breakingdradles
I don't find those inconsistencies all that remarkable.
People seem to assume that personal narratives are polished, precise, flawlessly logical, vetted, referenced, with layers of confirmation etc.
Not so.
Personal narratives are . . . well . . . very . . . uhhhhh
personal.
They are personal recollections by flawed critters with flawed memories and flawed communication skills to other flawed critters.
I think a good deal of the inconsistencies you seem to have trouble with could easily be explained by
1. aging memory trying to articulate remarkable events considerably after the events.
2. events and phenomena which challenge conventional articulations by conventional descriptive phrasing.
I have no trouble giving him the benefit of the doubt.
I think postulating that he was a rabid thorough-going disinfo agent primarily or only . . . is too much of a stretch.
Originally posted by MAC269
reply to post by SkepticOverlord
So here we have an ex white house staff member saying that Roswell and all the rest of it is true.
Has he got another book coming out soon?? It is the only reason I can figure he would tell porkys.
So now what???
Where is Mike on this one??