George Knapp Interviews UFO Whistle-Blower Colonel Philip Corso (ATS Exclusive), page 1

Colonel Philip Corso is one of the most important and controversial UFO whistleblowers ever to emerge. The former Army Intelligence officer says he was the number two man in a key Pentagon office which oversaw the exploitation of technologies retrieved from "crashed saucer sites." There is no question Corso worked at the Pentagon in the position that he claims. His 1997 book The Day After Roswell was an international best seller, though many now dispute Corso’s allegations about the role he played in leaking alien technology to American industry.

In 1992, years before anyone else in the UFO field had ever heard of Corso, reporter George Knapp met and interviewed the colonel and heard, for the first time his astounding tale about the military’s knowledge of an ET presence on Earth. Knapp also recorded the first on-camera interview with Corso, conducted more than a year before Corso’s book was released. A few pieces from that interview have been shown publicly, but the full interview hasn’t been seen by anyone else. The 1996 interview covers Corso’s amazing career, his hands-on involvement with pieces of technology taken from crash sites, his other encounters with the UFO mystery, and his knowledge of an ongoing coverup.

---

(larger part one) -- Part Two -- Part Three -- Part Four -- Part Five -- Part Six -- Part Seven -- Part Eight

---

reply to post by SkepticOverlord

---

Thank for posting this video SO.

Here is a rather interesting thread based on some of his claims.

Enjoy

Definitive Back Engineered Alien Technology Research thread

reply to post by antar

---

It makes me feel better that he's waving.

Lulz.

I click on the link to Part 6 and instead it goes to Part 8.

media.abovetopsecret.com...

However, in Part 8, Corso says that the NSA was picking up alien "intercepts" in code in the 1950's. Somebody ought to fire a note over to Seth Shostak at SETI and bring him up to speed.

Funnily enough, it is statements like the one referred to above, which place everything else that comes out of the man's mouth into question.

It is highly likely that the NSA has never received a transmission from aliens in code, particularly using 1950's radio receivers. But Corso doesn't qualify his statement in any way that would indicate that he has two clues to rub together on the subject, that he knows about the efforts made by SETI or that he knows that NSA, vintage 1950, probably came to the realisation themselves that whatever they thought might be an alien transmission was really something else.

There is something about his manner, the little "insider" put downs he was giving the interviewers, that really put me off. Info or disinfo. Take your pick. Sometimes he sounds like a yarn spinner and sometimes he sounds pretty sharp but never sharp enough to really convince me of anything.

Maybe I just don't know enough to really put him in context like George Knapp can.

[edit on 13-8-2009 by ipsedixit]

reply to post by SkepticOverlord

---

So here we have an ex white house staff member saying that Roswell and all the rest of it is true.

Has he got another book coming out soon?? It is the only reason I can figure he would tell porkys.

So now what???

Where is Mike on this one??

reply to post by antar

---

Why is there an orange glow/tinge to the photo? Where was this photo allegedly taken? I'm intrigued.

reply to post by antar

---

I can't wait.

U2U me when you're ready to post it please.

reply to post by breakingdradles

---

I don't find those inconsistencies all that remarkable.

People seem to assume that personal narratives are polished, precise, flawlessly logical, vetted, referenced, with layers of confirmation etc.

Not so.

Personal narratives are . . . well . . . very . . . uhhhhh

personal.

They are personal recollections by flawed critters with flawed memories and flawed communication skills to other flawed critters.

I think a good deal of the inconsistencies you seem to have trouble with could easily be explained by

1. aging memory trying to articulate remarkable events considerably after the events.

2. events and phenomena which challenge conventional articulations by conventional descriptive phrasing.

I have no trouble giving him the benefit of the doubt.

I think postulating that he was a rabid thorough-going disinfo agent primarily or only . . . is too much of a stretch.

reply to post by antar

---

I dont know why, but this picture just feels right for some reason.
two lines, Im on ats parole.

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: