It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Health insurance is fundamentally about peace of mind. If you have good insurance, you don't have to worry about an accident or sudden illness. You know that whatever happens, you and your family will be taken care of.
We can't eliminate all disease. But through health reform, we can give every American access to quality, affordable health insurance so that if they do get sick, they have the best chance possible of getting better without bankrupting their families.
The current health-care system gives insurance companies all the power. They get to pick and choose who gets a policy. The
So why is it that so many people are up in arms about my opportunity to have health insurance when it is not socialism, is not government take over, and does not effect them?
Think about it, you buy a stamp for 42 cents and drop a letter in your mailbox, and within few days that letter is in the mailbox of your friend on the other side of the country. That's not too shabby if you ask me.
Originally posted by marg6043
Perhaps the question is Who is going to pay for the reform anyway it comes, .
President Obama proposed to limit itemized deductions for wealthier Americans, a move he said could raise substantial revenue. Elise Gould, PhD, director of health policy research for the Economic Policy Institute, says that large cost savings from more efficient health care delivery could also help cover the costs. “I also think the House bill has a pretty good solution, and that is to add a surcharge on people with high incomes,” said Gould from her Washington, DC office. “Above $350,000 there is a certain percent that goes up from there that wealthier Americans would have to pay, and that would go a long way toward paying for health care reform.”
...
From Gould’s perspective, offering a plan that competes with private insurance has no downside and succeeds in giving Americans more options. “In the individual insurance market, and in the small group market, there is little to no competition, and that is one of the problems that has led to high costs for small businesses and individuals,” says Gould. “A public option would put a check on the problems with insurance businesses. It would be an option that does not have a profit motive, and an option that would foster health system reform. It is really a win-win. If people like it, it will grow. If people don’t like it, it won’t grow and it won’t be effective.”
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I can find nothing to dislike about this proposal so far.
Originally posted by marg6043
Embedded in the "health insurance reform" is a very tricky item that ask for access to peoples bank accounts.