It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by budski
Wriggle, wriggle
You have stated that he has probably had private treatment - prove it.
Originally posted by blueorder
Originally posted by john124
Hmmm so you see his excellent NHS treatment actually has contributed to extending his life beyond all expectations.
well it really does not prove that the "excellent" NHS predicted he would die within 2 years, and that turned out to be a crock of turd- maybe it is in his genes, maybe he is just lucky, but without alternate universe Hawkings you can prove jack s
A Phd student wouldn't be able to afford private treatment, and his family were not wealthy. Thankfully the NHS doesn't distinguish who to treat by how much they can afford to pay.
You have no idea what his earnings were or sources of income, you have no idea how much private health care would cost for him (for someone young it is dirt cheap)
0.9 years brother you must feel well safe
How's it feel when all the evidence supports what Hawking's said?
there is no "proof" it is his belief that the NHS saved his life, but until we have duplicate hawkings living the same life under different health care systems it remains proof
Balls to you Yanky, who can't use google to save his life.
Brilliant stuff, Im from Belfast you cheeser
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by blueorder
See now I never said that he would have died in the US, so I have nothing to prove.
Whereas you stated that no-one can prove that the NHS saved his life.
I say that's a crock.
He was born in the UK, was diagnosed by the NHS, has had NHS treatment all his life.
What kept him alive, fresh air?
Or the NHS treatment he has received all his life, that he would have died without?
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by blueorder
See now I never said that he would have died in the US, so I have nothing to prove.
Whereas you stated that no-one can prove that the NHS saved his life.
I say that's a crock.
He was born in the UK, was diagnosed by the NHS, has had NHS treatment all his life.
What kept him alive, fresh air?
Or the NHS treatment he has received all his life, that he would have died without?
Originally posted by blueorder
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by blueorder
See now I never said that he would have died in the US, so I have nothing to prove.
it is pretty much the basis for this thread
* Idiotic article does not realise Hawkings is British
* Hawkings responds with the opinion NHS saved his life
* Idiots on the other side of the debate then use this as an attack on the US system
Whereas you stated that no-one can prove that the NHS saved his life.
I say that's a crock.
He was born in the UK, was diagnosed by the NHS, has had NHS treatment all his life.
What kept him alive, fresh air?
Or the NHS treatment he has received all his life, that he would have died without?
the NHS said he would live for 2 years, it appears they were pretty inept in that diagnosis.
Anyway, I aint an NHS hater, I think it needs amended, like the US system needs amended, but if you want evidence of his private care, here is but one example
news.bbc.co.uk...
In 1980, he changed to a system of community and private nurses, who came in for an hour or two in the morning and evening.
Originally posted by john124
Hmmm why focus on the negative aspects only. Isn't it worth celebrating that somebody lived 67 years and is still alive today when he was told he had 2 years left to live?
The NHS provides a pretty decent service despite the ineptness you perceive.
The basis of this thread is that Stephen Hawking said he wouldn't be here if not for the NHS, not the crap you said it was about.
Like I've said previously, it's the early stages of the treatment by the NHS where he could not afford private healthcare that saved his life.
Whether private healthcare later prolonged it further does not change this one fact that Hawking's himself has said.
From the BBC source you gave:
In 1980, he changed to a system of community and private nurses, who came in for an hour or two in the morning and evening.
It was 1963 he was diagnosed. So according to your evidence he has lived under NHS healthcare for 17 years at least. Much more than the 2 years doctors said he had left to live. Hardly inept healthcare!
We've tried to be patient, but you just do not seem to understand these basic points in your clueless haze.
Originally posted by budskiNo, the basis of this thread is that Stephen Hawking said he wouldn't be here if not for the NHS.
Once again, the clue is in the title.
You have stated that there's no way that can be proved.
I have stated that he was born in the UK was diagnosed by the NHS, had treatment by the NHS and was, in other words, kept alive by the NHS, because if the NHS did not exist he would not have been treated by them - so QED the NHS has kept him alive.
Therefore you are wrong.
Yes, and what you term as "crap" is just opinions which you dislike in relation to said comment from Hawkings, so if you don't like it don't bother reading them
listen chum, I was having a separate discussing with budski who demanded proof of private care, don't join in as you appear to be confused
oh how wonderful for you, with your grand assumptions of my nationality and your crass "yank" reference- I couldnae give a flying fisherman's turd what false levels of superiority you think you have, just so ye know pal
Originally posted by blueorder
Originally posted by budskiNo, the basis of this thread is that Stephen Hawking said he wouldn't be here if not for the NHS.
Once again, the clue is in the title.
You have stated that there's no way that can be proved.
I have stated that he was born in the UK was diagnosed by the NHS, had treatment by the NHS and was, in other words, kept alive by the NHS, because if the NHS did not exist he would not have been treated by them - so QED the NHS has kept him alive.
Therefore you are wrong.
Incorrect- the only way you could prove this is to go back in time and see how long he survived with different treatment (or not treatment at all)
Can you do that buddy?