It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A far more practical solution would be to break out of the paradigm of violence being met with violence. That may not be a popular view, but it is my two cents.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Originally posted by CrowServo
Full disclosure - I am anti-gun. I think the 2nd Amendment is a relic from a different age and completely futile in our present world. If your government wants to crack down on you, your little firearm will not protect you.
But if some crackhead decides to rob me, burgularize my home, rape my wife or daughter .. I bet cha my little firearm will protect me and my family a lot better than the government.
How much more emboldened would said crackhead be if he knew with certainty there would not be any such resistance?
The material odds are so stacked against you that you would stand no chance. The best you could do is go down firing. And while that may appeal to some sort of romanticized cowboy ideal, in reality you will just end up dead, with the only consolation being that perhaps you will have taken someone else's life in the process. Is that something of which to be proud?
I forgive your very limited viewpoint on this subject.
A far more practical solution would be to break out of the paradigm of violence being met with violence. That may not be a popular view, but it is my two cents.
It sounds good on paper. Unfortunately.. it just isn't reality. Never has been. And since the USA is not the only manufaturer of firearms in this world. they will still exist... they will still exist in America-through clandestine (black market) means...which is squarely operated by those than have no intention of following the law.
Originally posted by PieKeeper
Right to bear arms or not, anyone other than secret service, police, etc. carrying a gun near the president is extremely inappropriate. It presents a MAJOR security risk, whether you have hostile intentions or not.
It's pretty much common sense not to carry a firearm when you're going to see the president.
the large majorigy of gun fires are not in self defense, most gun fires are criminal or accidental.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Let me give you another one for your warm fuzzy "Feelings."
I handle uranium fuel cells to be installed in nuclear reactors for a living. Both the olde spent cells as well as the new ones to be installed.
Do you feel threatened by me carrying a gun??
Think further than the next sound bite or pubic education standards...or "Feelings."
Alot of the peoples on these forums have worked or still work in occupations where diciplines are standard format/requirements. We do not live for our "feelings" by putting limits on others or guilt.
We live by diciplining ourselves and our feelings. Drama Queens like Chris Matthews and others stand out very quickly to us. I wouldn't trust Chris Matthews and many others to take care of my pets litter box.
Thanks,
Orangetom
[edit on 12-8-2009 by orangetom1999]
Originally posted by jd140
If the secret service didn't have a problem with it then who is Chris Matthews to argue it? Obviously the Secret Service felt that he wasn't a threat.
I would hate to think what I would have said if he talked to me that way.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
It would be very easy to eliminate this guy as a threat, just post an agent 3 feet behind him, with orders to fire if his weapon leaves his holster. I'd be more concerned about the guy with the C-4 T-shirt anyway.