It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

MSNBC host: Word "Socialist" is code word for N-word

page: 4
30
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 08:32 AM
link   
Wow, that actually passes for a news channel?

Trying to censor people by making opposing views seem racist just shows what kind of tactics they use, or do they really believe all the things they say.

So much spin from left to right that it was a no ball.




posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 09:21 AM
link   
its making me sick how the obama admin and leftist media are trying to paint every one against there agenda as a racist. im not saying every one is doing that, but a large portion seems to think if your anti obama, your a nazi



posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 05:27 PM
link   
Well, it's true it is absurd for the red necks to cry socialist at the town halls.

Since it is clearly not socialist maybe there is another meaning. If you don't know what socialist means, please look it up before you call the democrats socialist.....

I mean if the administrations health care proposal gets passed, USA will still be a lot more right-wing than it's closest western allies like the United Kingdom, Canada etc.

If you think the US democrats are socialists, what is for example the United Kingdom that has a citizen health care system (along with private alternatives), paid by the state since like 60 years... Communists?

Strange that according to the Hill Billy's logic, all the western Nato allied countries must be socialists states in disguise since they all have government provided health care... wow.

This is going beyond insane to be honest. President Obama's proposal is still more right-wing conservative than even the most right-wing-conservative western country ally, and there is still all these conspiracy socialist theories..



posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 07:40 PM
link   
Did anyone else notice how that commentator's face seemed to morph a bit in the beginning of the video. Unless it was just something wrong with the cameras, it looked like that guy could have been one of the reptilian shape-shifters.



posted on Aug, 13 2009 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Who cares what the moron from MSNBC says. So be it. Obama is a socialist charlatan. Pelosi is a socialist hag and Reed is a socialist simpleton. This is a socialist adminstration along with the congressional leaders and everyone except Shade knows it. They are not mainstrean Dems. The people are pissed. They have stopped drinking the koolaid and we are seeing the beginning of something very unique.



posted on Apr, 6 2013 @ 05:51 PM
link   
Let's not forget about this tactic
Still going on!



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 02:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Let's not forget about this tactic
Still going on!

well no less than the people calling others socialist, even though there is nothing intrinsically bad about socialism..
bad regimes that call themselves socialist doesn't make socialism bad it makes the regime bad.

question for you: if you understood what socialism is, would you consider the term valid when applied to obama?

like communist, socialist is a slur in america, and a safe way to protect someone from being proven to be a racist. when the facts show that obama is no different than any other president yet people create a double standard that he can't overcome because he is a "socialist".
there is nothing socialist about him, he is a middle of the road moderate that is slightly to the right, he is not anymore socialist than bush or clinton.
so why is he called a socialist? because socialists are still an allowed target, and since nothing obama has done is really that different from bush, it can be argued that the issue is something else and the label of socialist is indeed code for him being black.

why wasn't clinton treated the way obama has been? or bush? why was the outcry against obama so much louder? the bailout? the stimulus? ACA?
bush had both, a bailout and a stimulus, the outcry wasn't even close to the grumbling obama got. sure bush gave money back but it was split evenly, you didn't get the money back you put in, and it didn't do anything other than give people one more payment on their car.
at least obama tried to do something to rev up the economy, but was despised for it, even though it did help, unlike what bush did.
the bailout? well those things were rolling when obama took office, he only took them over.
the ACA? nothing more than a warmed over clinton era republican idea, so how can the people that came up with it hate the idea?
because of who promoted it.



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join