It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
While the health-care battle has dominated the news industry the last few weeks our Congress has quietly been trying to sneak the “Providing for Additional Security in States’ Identification Act of 2009″ (PASS ID Act or S. 1261) into law.
“A bill to repeal title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005 and amend title II of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to better protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of personally identifiable information collected by States when issuing driver’s lice
This will do the exact opposite of helping prevent identity theft, as anyone with an RFID chip reader who is in range could have all of your personal information.
While the health-care battle has dominated the news industry the last few weeks our Congress has quietly been trying to sneak the “Providing for Additional Security in States’ Identification Act of 2009″ (PASS ID Act or S. 1261) into law.
What this description conveniently doesn’t tell you is that it would require everyone to carry a National ID card, something that Americans have made clear they are strongly against...
Make no mistake about it, this PASS ID Act is almost exactly the same as the REAL ID Act. The same REAL ID Act that 24 states rejected.
is a proposed U.S. law intended to replace REAL ID. Like REAL ID, it implements federal standards for state identification documents. Currently, states are not obligated to follow the standards, but if PASS ID takes full effect, federal agencies will only accept identification from states that materially comply with the law, citizens from non-compliant states would need to provide federally issued documents such as a social security card or U.S. passport in order to enter federally-owned buildings.
PASS ID would eliminate REAL ID requirements that are considered excessive, such as the obligation to verify birth certificates with the issuing department, and shared national databases.
Chief among the bill’s supporters is Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, who stands to wield expansive and virtually unchecked power to set standards.
Under Dangerous ID, Napolitano can unilaterally expand required information on driver's licenses, potentially to include biometric information such as retinal scans, fingerprints, DNA information, and even Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) radio tracking technology.
You see, Dangerous ID[passID] actually requires that driver’s license photographs meet United Nation’s biometric format standards. At this level of sophistication, government software can analyze facial characteristics and generate a unique identification number.
www.liveleak.com...
How serious/possible do you think this is?
Biometrics Key To Employment Verification: Schumer
Law360, New York (July 21, 2009) -- An effective system for verifying the legal status of workers in the U.S. must use “biometric identifiers” such as photographs or fingerprints, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and experts on Capitol Hill said Tuesday.
Employers must ultimately be held accountable for verifying the legal status of immigrants who work for them, Schumer said, and could more justly be held accountable if better tools were...
employment.law360.com...
According to reports, U.S. troops are using mobile scanners to take fingerprints, eye scans, and input other personal data from Iraqis at checkpoints, workplaces, the sites of attacks, and door-to-door canvasses. This information is then being used to build an unprecedented identification database of Iraqis that is administered by the U.S. military. However, there is as yet no indication of any privacy safeguards protecting against the risk that this information will be used to fuel the ethnic cleansing.
epic.org...
Robert Mocny (DHS US-Visit) stated that “information sharing is appropriate around the world, and DHS plans to create a “Global Security Envelope of internationally shared biometric data that would permanently link individuals with biometric ID, personal information held by governments and corporations.”
This system attacks state and national sovereignty and our rights of representation. U.S. citizens have no control over the international organizations that will identify them and control their ability to buy, sell and travel. A universal ID system will break open the borders, not help control them.
www.dhs.gov...
Originally posted by CuriousSkeptic
I'm confused on what the justification is for these cards or for any sort of ID more significant than our ordinary driver's licenses. I personally am not enthusiastic about any of this and I would consider not filling out or accepting any of these cards. Truthfully, I'd like more info on the subject.
Good topic