As I've said before, my hearing is very poor, so I'm unable to make much sense of the John Lear interviews you posted here, as there is no
transcript, and no video for me to attempt to lipread from.
So, I went looking for transcripts of the interviews. I was unable to find transcrips of the interviews by Jim Fetzer -- just references to them --
but was able to find transcripts of John's interviews on Project Camelot
About halfway down the page of part one (of four), John starts talking about 9/11. He is firmly in the holographic projection camp. A curious
thing is that he states that it's his belief that the [alleged] hologram around the WTC was projected from another plane:
J: And that’s why the basement of the World Trade Center was molten for six weeks, is because, when it finally does hit the ground, it heats
it up so much. You can pour as much water as you want, it’s not going to cool off for a time. So I believe all of this was controlled by the E-4B,
the Doomsday airplane, the 747 that was seen flying over the White House.
I think there is the one that did the holographic projection, and they also transmitted the CGI, computer graphics, to the different TV channels, to
show the airplanes allegedly crashing. That’s why we had the accidental nose out on one of the, on one of the buildings. They were the ones that
sent the alleged cell phone messages, which never occurred. They did all kinds of stuff. They made probably transponder things for the different ATCs
K: So you’re saying the hologram had to come out of, had to be done by a plane in the air?
J: It was done by a projector. A holographic projector.
However, prior to that, John is talking about his friend Norm Bergrun and says
He said, “Just before I retired I was driving down on the Bay
Shore Freeway to Sunnyvale”. and he said, “I had a friend in the right seat of the car”. And he says, “Like, it was about 8 o’clock in the
morning, maybe 8:15”. He said, “we’re driving south and we saw this shadow and we looked up, and here...” he says, “It wasn’t a 747, but
it was a HUGE four-engined airplane, it wasn’t 200 feet above us”. And he said, “We looked out at, looked at this thing” he said “of course
we’re, you know, 20 miles from San Jose, you know, and 30 miles from San Francisco. There’s no possible way an airplane could, you know,
legitimately be flying right there”.
....... however, in your earlier NPT thread, VideoWW, isn't it true that John reports this little anecdote as being his own? And, also confusing,
John said that Norm reported the alleged hologram as having a shadow???
John goes on to say in the PC interview:
The World Trade Center was collapsed by a direct energy weapon, being operated from one of the outer space weapons platforms, and the reason we
know is because of the size of the dust that was left of the concrete. It was approximately 80 microns, and that’s what a direct energy weapon
collapses when it’s pointed down. That’s what it uses, it’s called “molecular disassociation”. I mean, it just disassociates the molecular
structure of concrete and that’s why all that dust was there. There was just nothing left
80 microns????? Do you realize that's approximately the WIDTH of a human hair? There was nothing left of the WTC concrete larger than 80 microns?
The "direct energy weapon" even crushed the aggregate in the concrete to 80 microns?
As I've said, John is an engaging speaker. If what I found on PC is the same stuff he talks about in this recent series of interviews you've
posted in this thread, then Mr. Lear doesn't produce much in the way of evidence of NPT, let alone "proof". It's anecdotal, and unsupported
You might want to read all four parts from PC (you can get to them by my above link, and all four parts are linked to each other on the bottoms of the
interview pages). I mean Mr. Lear no disrespect, however you might want to reexamine him as a source for your NPT.
To me, this does nothing to refute -- at least in a credible, supportable way -- the assertation that two airplanes struck the WTC.
[edit on 12/8/09 by argentus]