Should Parenting be Licensed? A Very Tricky Question., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 9-8-2009 @ 05:12 PM by Sundancer
reply to post by kiwifoot



So are you suggesting that because there are some children dying of abuse in the US that the rest of us 304,059,724 should have to answer to the government?

I say NO WAY!



reply posted on 9-8-2009 @ 05:16 PM by Sundancer
reply to post by Annee



LOL great points! I have to shake my head and wonder more often than not what happened that made humans so stupid.

Woo hoo for the animals!


reply posted on 9-8-2009 @ 05:43 PM by mopusvindictus
What kind of Crazy imbecile do you have to be to say the govt should have input on reproduction?

I suppose that the Rockerfellas and Obamas and Clintons and Blair's and Gore's etc, etc of the world have more insight on how should reproduce and can predict the outcome better than nature it's self right?

because you know... we failed to go from Monkeys to Mankind without these freaks involved right?

LOL everyone on ats is an expert in everything, you all know that trailer trash mom might not give birth to the next Einstein that get's us off this rock without some class or without dad around right?

Because the greatest minds that have Freed Humanity have had great fricken childhoods.... especially back in times when the life expectancy was 24 and you died at first need of a root canal...

Because a higher percentage on paper of criminals come from dysfunctional homes and poverty we should FORGET the MILLIONS of children who draw inspiration from such circumstance and go on to super excel

perhaps maybe we should read the percentages of children who go on to higher than average functionality from such circumstances...

but oh wait.... they only fund studies of children who end up in prison... they don't actually fund studies of super achievers, who overcome the odds...

Perhaps maybe some of you need to not just look at research but Who funds the research and what their actual agenda is is?

It would be nice I suppose

To allow a handful of us to have unlimited beach front property with endless miles of nature preserves surrounding them with all the benefits of modern technology yet only 1/5 of the people... and all those who BUILT that infra structure for them reduced by Eugenics to a handful of servants...

But I'd personally rather bring 10 kids to "their" beach and leave a giant poop right on their doorstep ring the door bell set it on fire and run...

But that's just me...

Because i'll be damned to hell if I watch an entire infrastructure built by generations of hard working people built to create a world of limitless possibilities just for a handful of us who "think" they are better, to kill everyone else off and keep it to themselves...

Parenting be licensed?

Over my dead body....

Like I want a world where these in breeds reproduce their one child at 51 with even MORE genetic disorders and insanity traits than the last 1,000 years of inbreeding between their families gave us in the first place lol


reply posted on 9-8-2009 @ 06:50 PM by Annee
Originally posted by Sundancer
reply to
post by Annee



LOL great points! I have to shake my head and wonder more often than not what happened that made humans so stupid.

Woo hoo for the animals!


I guess my ego isn't so big - that I think popping out more humans - with no intelligent plan is a good idea.

IMO - "its a natural thing" - - is archaic and irresponsible considering the condition of our planet.


reply posted on 9-8-2009 @ 09:31 PM by Jess_Undefined
reply to post by ravenshadow13



When you said locking kids in closets, it made me think of a particular memory I remember when I was about 6 years old. My mom was going out one night with a friend of hers. She brought me and my sister over her friends house. Me and my sister had to stay at the house alone, and my mothers friend actually put her twin girls in the closet. The twins were only about 6 months old.

It was ridiculous.



reply posted on 10-8-2009 @ 02:22 AM by king9072
Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to
post by kiwifoot




In the UK, and probably in the US and most countries, you need a license to drive a car, to own a dog, possess a gun, to fish etc, etc.

If we need a license, training and background checks for these, should we not need a license for the most important and difficult task a human can undertake - that of having a child?


We shouldnt need a license to "drive a car, to own a dog, possess a gun, to fish ". This is just some BS way so they can make some revenue by taxing us even more and keep their nose in our business.

They need to stay the heck out of our lives and worry about what they are doing because God knows the government has enough problems without worrying about whether I got a fishing license or something.

As far as parenting goes, we need to stay the heck out of each others business. If your neighbor is a bad parent its none of your business. Worry about your own kids and quit crying to daddy government everytime someone does something in a way you dont agree with.

[edit on 8/9/2009 by grapesofraft]



Wow, we can agree on something.

But I think there should be some sort of class, and if the mother is working she should be able to take paid time off work at the governments expense. A few months would be suffice.

People immediately scream, OH MY GAD NOT MY TAX DOLLARS!

Well, those people are short sighted. Because the cost of a poor childhood is exponentially larger than paying for that mother to be taught how to raise a good person. Intelligence is something that can be nurtured, and can be destroyed with poor parenting. I have witnessed this many times in my life.

Just as with intelligence, how 'good' or 'evil' that child becomes can also depend on the type of childhood it experiences. Thus, making sure children have good childhoods is essential to a healthy society.

But no, there should not be a "license", yet another hidden tax. Just a course, that should be mandatory but cost nothing to the mother. Proper child rearing should be a priority.


reply posted on 10-8-2009 @ 02:45 AM by heyo
reply to post by mopusvindictus




that post jacked me up.



that is all.
stay outta my family's life and welfare. If you can't undestand it, then I will assume that your purpose is to indoctrinate my family into a similiar line of please and thank you, everything will be alright type of world.
For all actions after said observations, I will not be held accountable for....
.....this line of thinking is so dangerous to me it makes me stop my lurking obsession.
The morals my parents passed onto me are not for sale, nor are they negotiable.
that explanation should turn away any sane person.
my fear is it wont.


reply posted on 10-8-2009 @ 02:46 AM by open_eyeballs
reply to post by kiwifoot



I feel compelled to answer this profoundly idiotic question in the title.
Sorry, but it is the worst idea I have ever come across on ATS.

While I agree, their are parents today that just suck...

But to think you can run a background check on someone and that be an accurate sign of how good of a parent they are going to be is just inane.

And who are you or who gives any government agency the moral authority as to tell me if I am a good enough person to have a baby or not...?

This is a below top secret thread and is sad that such a thing is even considered...

sorry, op..bad idea to the tenth power


reply posted on 10-8-2009 @ 03:24 AM by orwellianunenlightenment
reply to post by Annee



It is the very nature of control that is the problem. It is control for the mere sake of control that replicates generations of hateful parenting. And I don't care if the family is well off and are trained insect taskmasters (educated in some's eyes); if these families are spitting out yet another generation of empathy-less, empty, sociopathic parasites, then they are doing nothing to make the situation on this planet any better. They are merely stretching the problem (which also ultimately corrects it, but all is ultimately self-correcting, but I digress). Perhaps you should sign yourself up for culling, for the good of humanity. As long as people think strengthening the supremely myopic mechanism will help, things will still cycle in the ridiculous fashion that they do. We all internally can find the way out, but many do not have the testicular or ovarian fortitude. Lost in a sea of replication and confusion, many are.


reply posted on 10-8-2009 @ 03:36 AM by MAC269
reply to post by kiwifoot



Dear kiwifoot

Quite right Here Here Parenting should be licensed.

There are people who should not be allowed to live let alone have kids.

Only good folk should have kids and we should chouse them.

Oh hell it all be done before by a guy with a silly mustache called Adolfe Hitler

Sorry mate but you asked for that one.


reply posted on 10-8-2009 @ 05:07 AM by kiwifoot
Originally posted by open_eyeballs
reply to
post by kiwifoot





While I agree, their are parents today that just suck...


Yes there are, and whatever rights you think you're protecting, doesn't help the poor dead children killed every year by abuse and neglect, what good are your rights there? Don't they have rights too?

But to think you can run a background check on someone and that be an accurate sign of how good of a parent they are going to be is just inane.


READ what I put in the OP:

criminal background checks to rule out those with records of viloence or abuse.

What about those who fail the background & suitability checks? The system obviously cannot stop them from having the child, but at least they would be flagged as an at risk preganancy and given special attention, plus help to try and pass the license test and to address issues found.


You have to have background checks to WORK with Children, but to HAVE your own you don't. Now get of your panic button for a minute and see the glaring hypocrisy with that.

And yes, I said the system would not be able to STOP anybody having kids, read it!

But any system that flags up people with abusive/viloent criminal pasts, who may be a risk to kids isa good thing.

And the other points:-

Giving training to new parents
Providing equipment to new parents
Supporting and advising new parents

Oh defiintely bad ideas!

Try to read the post next time, instead of reading ONLY this:



Parenting License arghhh

Background check arghhhh

Fee arghhhhhhhhh

Control arghhhhhhhhhh



reply posted on 10-8-2009 @ 05:13 AM by kiwifoot
Originally posted by MAC269
reply to
post by kiwifoot



Dear kiwifoot

Quite right Here Here Parenting should be licensed.

There are people who should not be allowed to live let alone have kids.

Only good folk should have kids and we should chouse them.

Oh hell it all be done before by a guy with a silly mustache called Adolfe Hitler

Sorry mate but you asked for that one.


That was low!

I said nothing of the sort, that's just what you wanted to read.

I said background checks were to highlight criminally abusive/viloent persons, to protect the child, not to stop them having children, so they an be supported more.

The idea was for support and training, advice and help, not control.

Like I said in a previous post, I once tought in a school, I had to do a thorough background check, now that was for working in a scholl, for god's sake if I'm having a child, how can that be any less of a fitting situation to do a background check?

Oh, and I hate mustaches.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 14 days ago with 10 member flags
pro Israel or aginst them read this asap!
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 3 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags