reply to post by maloy
Ok - so if Russians "took over" Poti, care to explain why they are not there now? Or why they were no there even in September of last
year?
Took over for a few days is still an invasion deep within georgia proper.
Do you care for me to site some of the fatality figures thrown around in the US during 9/11? Some innitial ones were upwards of 20,000. All
that proves is that chaos may lead to indefinite figures.
Russia Today still shows vides today of S.Ossetian's claiming that 1,500 were killed! Yes that is propaganda!
Were the lives of civilians in Tskhinvali Saakashvili's to take? Was Iraq America's to take? Boo hoo - the US flushed down hundreds of
billions of dollars on the Iraq War. How much of a dent does several HUMVEES make on your budget?
Not my country's budget.... I'm British.
It's not the value of what is stolen that is at dispute, it's still stealing whatever it may be - boots or humvees.
I don't expect the teeny tiny losses to affect anybody at all.... Russia gives us all a laugh when they proclaim them as trophies, and that is enough
in return.
I heard 4 mig-31 jets got sold for £6. More embarrassment coming out of Russia.
Sergei Ivanov couldn't even admit Russia had peacekeepers inside S.Ossetia 2 days after the war started for the majority of the interview with the
BBC. I really really want to believe the Russian story has credibility, but their own actions in the media lead me to realise that they don't.
All they need is Pentagon's backing. And Biden seemed to be cuddling up with Saakashvili on his recent visit.
Well I hope this is wrong because it's not worth one more person dying over a piece of land. We are where we are regardless of our disagreements on
how we got here.
Why does US insists that Iran and Syria must not arm themselves? Meanwhile Iran and Syria started no wars for decades, and Georgia started a
war last year. Hypocrisy? Couldn't be.
That's an easy one... sales of arms to terrorist groups such as hezbollah. Iran does enough harm to it's own people and to Israel thru' hamas and
hezbollah, they don't need to attack another country directly.
They allowed monitors on the border. Monitors are no allowed inside, because the said monitors refuse to recognize South Ossetia's
independence.
How can the EU ever recognise S.Ossetia's independence with Russian occupation there, and without letting EU monitors inside? Cooperation works both
ways. And without these monitors, we can just accept Russia's word on the activities inside S.Ossetia.
Then explain why Russia did not invade Georgia during last year's war. it had the capability to do so, and US demonstrated unwillingness to
directly interfere.
Erm... Russia did invade half of Georgia proper. And don't forget the Georgian army was in a defensive position around Tbilisi. And President
Sarkozy did a good job brokering a cease-fire and for all Russian troops to leave Georgia proper.
Have you watched Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, BBC etc? Amazingly they show no bias what so ever, and are never selective in which news they report and
which they leave out.
Yes of course they do to some extent... but apart from Fox news maybe, Russia Today is much more extreme and comparable with Iranian state TV and
Iranian Press TV. Those are all entirely propaganda based and full of bull#.
Of course not. They should have more coverage of Michael Jackson's death. In fact they should dedicate a whole week to coverage on Michael
Jackson's death - taking the example of their Western media counterparts.
Haha that was funny.... I did not say follow the stories of western media. What I would expect is some domestic news and politics. You know about
Russia itself, after all that's what the channel is called - not S.Ossetia TV!!!
You know why they don't??!! It's because it's state run propaganda and it won't ever dare show news stories that the kremlin does not authorise,
and it definitely will not criticise the kremlin whatsoever.
British news media are always criticising politicians. I don't see that in Russian media, and I know it's not because they are perfect!
Anyway thanks for very for asking easy questions!!!
Oh and before I go here's some less biased news on S.Ossetia:
www.telegraph.co.uk...
key summary: Russian's arm S.Ossetian militia's.
Drunken militia's and russian's cause trouble and start a war.
Georgia are forced to fire back, and re-take S.Ossetia.
Russia sends in more reinforcements. Russia re-takes S.Ossetia and Russian airstrikes in S.Ossetia and Georgia unnecessarily kill the majority of
civilians that are killed.
Militia's cause havoc and destruction in the region near S.Ossetia and Russian so-called peacekeepers arm them and back them up.
Russia invades Abkhazia.
Russia forces the georgian army to retreat back to Tblisi.
Militia's are left by the Russian army to roam and burn down georgian villages.
Russian troops invade half of georgia proper, they trash & steal whatever they want like the violent thugs they are.
Russian troops only retreat after days of negotiating between the EU president and Medvedev.
And russian soldiers as far S.West as Poti who weren't officially called peacekeepers even by their own govt. became peacekeepers from their govt's
perspective by wearing an armband with the words "peacekeeper" written on it. So Russia doesn't distinguish peacekeeper or aggressive soldier even
themselves, so how are we supposed to. And their actions certainly show they are aggressive.
Up to the present day, Russia has broken the ceasefire and agreements put in place from last year according to the EUMM. Georgia have not according
to the EUMM.
[edit on 10-8-2009 by john124]