posted on Aug, 20 2009 @ 06:36 AM
Originally posted by Sam60
reply to post by Tifozi
All your points are fair enough.
Like I said, I don't think it's a perfect match but on balance I think it's still a plane, with an outside chance it's a piece of specialist
equipment such as that mentioned earlier in the thread (i.e. part of a large wind turbine).
I'm going to have to stop mixing up my aircraft nomenclature!
Good day (it's lunch time here. lol)
The only thing that bothers me is just the bottom... Because the sides actually are correct with the wings of a F-35 (it has small wings and are on
the back of the chassis. If this is the one that can lift verticaly, it must have space for the middle turbine) but not the bottom.
Acording to the aerodynimics and technology of the "thing" it must have a lot of flat angles (like the F-117 stealth bomber (people call it a
fighter because of the size, but it's a bomber...)) so it can evade radar more easly (like the F-22 does).
A big and round belly doesn't aid that at all.
As for the wind turbine theory(started by me actually), although people enjoy making fun of it, is the closest thing I have seen to that.
Believing or not, I have seen things very similar to this on various travels to home, and I can assure you that if I find them again I'll take
pictures so I can compare the two. When I say "wind turbine" people think of one already assembled... Well, those things can reach 30meters high...
They don't travel completed... but ok... People believe what they want.
Btw, just found this:
Tilt it to the left some 5º or so, put some dark cover on it, and imagine yourself at the distance of the photo in the OP, and tell me that they
don't look very similar. Just a thought...
(bate in mind that this things are very different from model to model, I know that this example looks different)
[edit on 20/8/09 by Tifozi]