It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
deductive reasoning in which a conclusion is derived from two premises
Originally posted by WhatTheory
reply to post by XTexan
Ok, then what was meant by telling Rush he is on thin ice?
i think anytime anyone ventures to compare anything to that, they're on thin ice...
Fascist governments forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Some how, some way Professor people seem to forget that Chancelor Obama actually campaigned for the United States Presidency by speaking at a rally in Berlin???
That's right Herr Obama really did visit Berlin and gave a campaign speech there lest we forget.
Now why do you imagine he did that? It wasn't a swing through Ramstien or some other Military Base crawling with U.S. Service Personnel it was to Germans where the good Herr Obama promised to make Germans proud again!
Now where would anyone get the idea he's a Nazi from?
This is an exact repeat of the 1930's, staged economic collapse around the world, an exploitable racial divide, a rush to nationalize various enterprises and functions, and most of it is being orchestrated by the Grand Children of the people responsible for it in the 1930's.
People do like to think it could never happen and that it will never happen but the reality is that it is actually happening and it is being done in plane sight and in obvious ways because they do know, that hardly anyone will accept it's happening until it's too late.
Facism is alive and well in Amerika today and it's headquarters is 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Gibbs is the perfect example of this. The guy is the most bumbling moron I've ever seen in position.
"I think anytime anyone ventures to compare anything to that, they are on thin ice."
As I've claimed in other posts, It's my suspicion that he left the country to get out from under the Patriot Act, phone taps etc... To make contact with his crony's in other countries letting them know what his plans were and to get their input.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Limbaugh must always be taken with a grain of salt . . . but he is right on this one.
Edit: Token second line
[edit on 8/7/2009 by Lemon.Fresh]
Originally posted by chiron613
There was absolutely no threat in what Obama's people said. It was civilized and reasonable, a proper response to Limbaugh's ad hominem attack against Obama.
There is something called "Godwin's Law", which states that any discussion that goes on long enough will eventually result in someone accusing their opponent of being a Nazi. According to the law, whoever does that loses the argument.